probably have a good chance of getting che adams. hes from leicester.
cant see gayle coming to be honest.
Exactly !
I really can't believe some people are STILL banging on about Bowen .
IT'S NOT GONNA HAPPEN FOR FUCKS SAKE !
Word down here is Man City want Muric having more game time so will loan him to someone else.
Or let's pay £15m for a 29 year old from Newcastle
Why would you want Lyle Taylor?
Honestly, I am mystified by that link.
He is 30 in March. He's only played 9 games so far this season.
Scored 21 in League one last season in by far the best season of his career; pretty much the only noteworthy one of a journeyman career.
I absolutely don't want us spending a penny on a 30 year old currently playing less than half his club's matches in his first ever season at this level.
You mean a 23 year old che Adam's, I'm happy we agree as they were my 2 choices.It isn't about balance when your formation is one up front. It's about a low scoring lump being available to deputise for the actual good striker. What I prefer is an actual good striker deputising.
I also smell a three year contract for another thirty something, largely non-scoring striker. I feel like we may have made this kind of deal before.
There are 23 year olds who can hold the ball up and be physical.
Not exactly the new Pukki is he?
Don't make this a personal attack on me, there is no need.Balance of options, maybe we may go 2 up front when we actually have 2 strikers who knows. I'd of loved to know your opinion if we had signed pukki before he made his name on a free last summer, would of been hilarious. Taylor is a good option, and within budget, like I said brentford do not sign duds.
Che Adams is a totally different prospect and I haven't uttered a word on that transfer; though I am extremely skeptical that we would have a prayerYou mean a 23 year old che Adam's, I'm happy we agree as they were my 2 choices.