Transfer Rumours | Page 14 | Vital Football

Transfer Rumours

On another note, Alan Nixon is saying that Hull want £20m or so for Jarrod Bowen. Now obviously, that suggests he's PL bound. But if we could offload Carvalho for what we bought him for, we wouldn't be that far away...

Carvalho fee+ Appiah fee+ a couple of million = Bowen?

Surely good business?
 
Pope John XXIII said:
On another note, Alan Nixon is saying that Hull want £20m or so for Jarrod Bowen. Now obviously, that suggests he's PL bound. But if we could offload Carvalho for what we bought him for, we wouldn't be that far away...

Carvalho fee+ Appiah fee+ a couple of million = Bowen?

Surely good business?
Click to expand...

non-starter
 
murray and gayle would be signings of intent.

murray is old but still got 13 goals in the prem last year. hes a good finisher and strong.
 
Pope John XXIII said:
On another note, Alan Nixon is saying that Hull want £20m or so for Jarrod Bowen. Now obviously, that suggests he's PL bound. But if we could offload Carvalho for what we bought him for, we wouldn't be that far away...

Carvalho fee+ Appiah fee+ a couple of million = Bowen?

Surely good business?
Click to expand...
Can't see how Hull think they can get £20M for Bowen now, when he is out of contract in the summer!?
 
Word down here is Man City want Muric having more game time so will loan him to someone else.
 
Going back to Tyler, whilst he is 23 / 24 he did well in League 2 and appears to be doing well in League 1. He does have 1 thing that you simply cannot coach, and that is pace.
Does he have the ability to do well in the championship, he held his own for a while for us so with the development he has had perhaps so.
Difficult decision for the club. Keep him at Lincoln for the remainder of the season or bring him back. If you do bring him back you have to play him and I also agree that perhaps on the left as part of the three up front would be good, particularly as Adomah is not affecting the game any more as a sub.
 
Feel that Walkers preferred slot is up front striker, not out wide as the expectation is that you offer your full back cover. If a slot wide is available Johnson has to fill on the left and Mighten on the right. Picture changes if one or both of these go out on loan. Feel Forest are not in a position to develop youngsters thru the first team. They have to be able to hit ground running, therefore expect strikers, number 10’s and wide men to be added to this window, result being all three younger players getting experience elsewhere.
 
eastanglianred said:
Going back to Tyler, whilst he is 23 / 24 he did well in League 2 and appears to be doing well in League 1. He does have 1 thing that you simply cannot coach, and that is pace.
Does he have the ability to do well in the championship, he held his own for a while for us so with the development he has had perhaps so.
Difficult decision for the club. Keep him at Lincoln for the remainder of the season or bring him back. If you do bring him back you have to play him and I also agree that perhaps on the left as part of the three up front would be good, particularly as Adomah is not affecting the game any more as a sub.
Click to expand...
Thought he looked quite effective when he played on the right side of a three under Warbs for a few games!
 
He’s never going up top whilst grabs is fit

Makes much more sense to play as front 3 out wide and utilise his pace to get behind and run at defences
 
You must log in or register to reply here.