Razorpound
Vital Squad Member
What a boring thread.
Rees Mogg has clearly been to the Diane Abbott school of maths.
52% to 48% is a significant margin of victory but a vote win of 200 to 117 is not.
While the EU has eliminated tariffs or agreed preferential rates/quotas/restrictions etc with Japan, it will not permit dumping
You didn't know what a trade deal was between two states but it didn't stop you pontificating about how the UK would be better off outside the EU. At least you asked for a definition. Now, you're pontificating about dumping and its effects without knowing what it means. So, I'll tell you: 'Dumping' is a term used in the context of international trade. It's when a country or company exports a product at a price that is lower in the foreign importing market than the price in the exporter's domestic market. Obviously, any trade deal will include anti-dumping provisions, which has somewhat pissed on your chips.That doesn't make sense, The EU has eliminated quotas but will not permit dumping? That is contradictory.
When I referred to dumping, I meant that when there are no tariffs, the Japanese will have unlimited free rein to sell their hi tech goods to EU citizens at a much more attractive price. That is not even mentioning giants like Honda, Nissan and Toyota being more able to compete with the German and French car manufacturers on a level playing field.
Of course, the same will apply vice versa so I suppose the citizens of Tokyo can snap up all the Polish, Bulgarian, Romanian, Lithuanian and Maltese goods they have been hankering after.
We will have to keep an eye on changes in trade deficits between the EU and Japan.
That happens already as they manufacture in the UK and sell throughout the EU. It might encourage those 'giants' to relocate into the EU post-Brexit, which will suit the 27 member states and fuck up the UK's economies. The more you think about it, the more it makes sense for these things to happen post-Brexit. See what you voted for. Post-Brexit, it quite likely that Vauxhall manufacture will be located to PSA's plants in Europe and a hard Brexit could mean Ford reviewing its activities in the UK. See what you voted for but it would make more sense if you could identify where these new market opportunities are for the UK post-Brexit or is it simply that bringing back our law-making, whatever that means, is your holy grail?That is not even mentioning giants like Honda, Nissan and Toyota being more able to compete with the German and French car manufacturers on a level playing field.
But we'll have control of our laws.The Japanese motor manufacturers will all re-locate their manufacturing to EEC countries within a few years when the next model of their range is due to be commenced imho. And Airbus will go in due course as well.
They only came here because we were in the EU and it will also be too difficult to manufacture efficiently as much larger stocks of parts, will be required.
All the worry about a no deal is manufactured by the Government to project fear and make MP's vote for May's rotten deal.
All we need to do is withdraw Article 50 and then reissue it the folllowing day. That would give an extra 2 years to sort out whether we want Brexit and in what form or whether we want to stay in the EU.
Can you just imagine another 2 years of "negotiating" and still achieving nothing? Most people will have lost the will to live after the first 2 years of this farce from this pathetic Tory government.All the worry about a no deal is manufactured by the Government to project fear and make MP's vote for May's rotten deal.
All we need to do is withdraw Article 50 and then reissue it the folllowing day. That would give an extra 2 years to sort out whether we want Brexit and in what form or whether we want to stay in the EU.
The people have already decided they want out in 2016.
Chelsea lads voting with their gobs again last night and sucking up to their far right Hungarian chums. The rest of us decided on that stuff long ago.
All people did in 2016 was effectively vote 'yes' or 'no'. Brexit wasn't defined; so, May's deal has delivered but it's unacceptable to many leavers as is a 'no-deal' departure. When the leavers can decide what they want, then we can have a fresh referendum on whether to remain or leave on specific terms. Arthurly spelt it out exactly.The people have already decided they want out in 2016.
All people did in 2016 was effectively vote 'yes' or 'no'. Brexit wasn't defined; so, May's deal has delivered but it's unacceptable to many leavers as is a 'no-deal' departure. When the leavers can decide what they want, then we can have a fresh referendum on whether to remain or leave on specific terms. Arthurly spelt it out exactly.
NOTHING was defined; unless you can find something which determined the terms under which people would vote to leave then NOTHING was defined in terms of the process as to how we leave the EU. As I said, May's deal delivers on the referendum but it's unacceptable to many leavers; so, how do you propose the referendum is dealt with. Why not come up with a suggestion instead of sniping from the wings.Leave was quite simply defined by David Cameron.
You have absolutely no idea what standard WTO terms means or the complications associated with negotiating dozens of individual trade deals entails.
Remember those Japanese soldiers in Thailand in WW2, who all bar a few jumped off cliffs because they refused to surrender. Even the [sort of influential] ERG group is talking about tougher negotiating with the EU because even they know a no-deal situation would be suicide.
You vote leave with no real understanding of what that means or the consequences other than what you read off Brexit stuff and like GBN believe all the hype about the EU ignoring all the positives and are prepared to live by your dogmatic stance even though you're not sure what it all means. Unlike those Japanese soldiers, you won't be committing suicide but you'll impose it on many others. Others like the millions who already can't make ends meet but would suddenly see many of their living costs go up overnight as WTO tariffs are imposed.
The likes of the ERG group and Farridge etc remind me of the leader of the Skoptsy Sect [Castrate] where the leaders advocated followers undergo castration but they [the leaders] didn't follow the rule.