in_the_top_one - 4/8/2017 22:15
Can I just clarify..
You think time travel may have happened and been covered up but you don't believe in satellites? Is that right?
Put it this way your failure to post any pictures of ISS from your camera demonstrated to me there is a very high probability it aint spinning around the earth.
Which leads to my thoughts on time travel which, having at this moment in time not personally met any time tourist are based on theoretical presumptions similar to those explained by Mathis.
He states that...
Time travel, strictly defined, is not possible, however, if we study the problem a bit closer, we find a more interesting analysis, one that implies that time travel, of a sort, IS possible.
All or most current time travel is based on the twin paradox, and on a certain interpretation of Einstein's time transformation equations. But I have shown that interpretation is false. It relies on bad math.
<img src="http://milesmathis.com/wink.jpg" alt="HTML5 Icon" style="width:428px;height:328px;">
The twin paradox is actually a poorly chosen visualization or thought problem, since it is overly abstract. Once you have astronauts zooming out into space, you have left the confines of most peoples' reason. In space, most people will accept anything, as we see with black holes, the big bang, and other fairy tales. It is better to keep our thought problems closer to home. What allowed me to analyze the problem further was watching an old episode of Star Trek. You will say we are still in space there, but the episode was not one of time travel. It all took place onboard the Enterprise, and no long journeys were part of the script. In fact, no one went anywhere, which is why it is so pertinent to this paper.
The crew begin hearing a high whining noise, like that of invisible insects. It turns out the Enterprise has been invaded by a group of people who are speeded up. They move so fast they are invisible. So we have twins here, but the twins, although going at very different speeds, never leave the immediate area. In one very important scene, Kirk is speeded up, so that he can talk to the fast people. He then sees the fast people going at his own rate, but he sees Spock and the others still in the room as going very very slowly, almost stopped.
All this is quite fascinating, as Spock would say, because it gives us another way of looking at the twin paradox. Let us say that one twin is the speeded up Kirk, and the other is Spock. Kirk immediately gets ahead of Spock, simply by going faster. Kirk is doing a lot of things and Spock is doing almost nothing. By one way of looking at it, we would say that Kirk has stepped into the future, since he may be doing things Spock hasn't done yet. Spock is left in the past. However, if we study it more closely, we see this isn't strictly true. By stepping into that future, Kirk cannot thereby see or definitely influence Spock's future. He has NOT stepped into Spock's future. We can prove this just by synching up their nows. Since Kirk can see Spock, he knows where Spock is. Their two nows can always be determined, and they are always the same. No one has gotten ahead of the other. The two can even touch. You cannot touch someone in the future or past, by definition. They are both in the same room, and they are both at now.
But this loose interpretation of time travel does give us more to think about, at least. The faster moving beings experience many more events over the same time (if we take time as a room clock on the Enterprise), so to the slower moving beings, the faster ones seem to move quickly from the past into the future. They come from a past longer and richer in events and move into a future longer and richer in events, and these exponential events allow for an exponential influence. While the slow beings are moving like molasses, the fast beings can do an extraordinary number of things, and all these things done will seem to be done in the future (as we saw with Spock's computer card).
By the same token, the fast beings will see the slow ones mostly living in the past. They will do things the faster beings have already done, so their actions will be immediately antiqued. The only action of the slow beings that the fast ones will notice are novel actions, and since the fast beings will have to go back to the slower ones, either by actually circling back or by looking back figuratively, these actions will seem to come from the past. We can see this most clearly if we make the fast beings travel in a line. If they travel in a line, they can only meet up with the slow beings by going back. Remember, the fast beings on Star Trek keep in contact only by circling. If they do not circle, they immediately leave the vicinity, and by doing so seem to move into one of the Enterprise's possible futures.
This mechanism and this interpretation is the only way we can logically accept the proposal of time travel. The current interpretation is not more esoteric, more novel, or more inventive, it is simply bad vector math.
http://milesmathis.com/travel.html
As usual I do keep an open mind to events and as such cannot totally discount that Tesla came up with time travel, it's just at this moment until more evidence is presented I believe it to be of low probability he did, hope that helps,
