I would have thought any normal person would have read that post as meaning what I said (though not your characterisation of what you say I had said).
You are being staggeringly kind to yourself here Chandos
Anyway, a lot of this is on Da Marco. He has been advising fir a long time, his ridiculous submissions were wrong, and he has posted the club's statement on his Twitter. His Twitter had also told us that he had been moving house and hanging around at QPR on the night before he was representing Forest (which is what I commented on, and you challenged). All of that is consistent with complacency, and Firest now have four points less.
I have no skin in the game when it comes to DeMarco one way or another, having never made any statements either in support or criticism of him.
However, given you tell me at the end of this post to think more and speak less, perhaps you might take your own advice?
The club appear to have admitted the charge immediately and pursued a strategy of cooperation which has won 2 precious points back. Who are you or I to say that another strategy would have won more, having neither legal training nor been there?
I mean, every point of our mitigation has been dismissed by the premier league and then the commission. Neither of us has the legal training to be able to say what alternative points of mitigation should have been put forward? I personally cannot think of anything else we could have argued in mitigation beyond what was put forward. Can you? And do you have the legal expertise to know if that would fly?
For whatever reason, you regularly contest what I say, and then when I justify by reference to what you have actually said, or the impression that it creates, you then say that you had said something different.
I don't know what the balance of unsolicited posts starting with me or you is. Certainly I've responded recently to a fair few where you have referenced me in a negative way out of the blue or quoted something else I've said. When I had a scan through your posts I was quite surprised by how many recently had been about me or aimed at me. Not sure I really understand the obsession.
And still what you are saying on this topic is weong. Even the day before yesterday, you were suggesting that both the Independent Commission and the Premuer League were conspiring against Firest, the former because their lenghty and closely reasoned decision came out the Minday after Forest drew with Luton Town, the inference being that they had corruptly changed their decision in the light of that result, and the latter, just because like many regulatory and prosecutorial organisations, that they sought serious punishment for serious breaches of the rules.
I might be guilty of occasionally conflating the commission and the Premier League, but my suspicions are very much about the Premier League. I have no idea how Independent the Commission really is. If it is as independent as our governmental regulators such as Ofsted, not very.
The fact is, the club have released a statement clearly saying more or less everything I have suspected on here; that they feel the Premier League have prosecuted this case with undue prejudice. They have detailed some of the evidence that makes them think so, and alluded to the tone and content of their submission, which neither of us has seen.
Clearly the club have long suspected the same thing that I have long suspected.
The fact is also that they have breached their own rules in terms of when these findings are released, unless this was given to the club on Friday. That may be the case.
Oh, and I personally wouldn't normally do this but the next time you decide to respond to me by pointing out a spelling mistake I've made, have a look at your own posts and remember how easy it is to make a mistake typing quickly on a phone with autocorrect not always giving you what you want
Maybe if you thought more and said less you would not spend your time in petty arguments on here.
I would say a far higher proportion of your posts are instigating petty arguments than mine are in participating in them. I am far from the only poster on here who as called you out on your nasty, bitter sniping at other posters.