Coddenchips
Vital Reserves Team
Hopefully he's passed his information and concerns on to the EFL.
To be fair Zakky, if anyone intends reading more than 5 articles a week, then they really should be forking out for the paper.Even if you register you only get about 5 views a week and the amount of stuff WEP puts on Twitter these days that's soon gone
To be fair Zakky, if anyone intends reading more than 5 articles a week, then they really should be forking out for the paper.
Not getting into a ping pong match with you if you want to buy it fine
Not getting into a ping pong match with you if you want to buy it fine
Wigan Today understands the takeover – which initially was greatly welcomed among the Latics fanbase – may not be the beacon of hope once thought.
Staff are believed to have been informed of a proposed 30 per cent cut in their wages, with a huge question mark over the long-term future of the club’s Academy.
It’s also not clear how much – if any – involvement the Supporters Club would have, despite having raised around £800,000 to save the club.
When asked whether it was his job to look after the best interests of the club or the creditors, Krasner replied: “I have a duty to sell the football club for the best possible price, and that’s what we’ve done. I’m not a moralist.”
It’s understood a couple of other groups – one involving former executive chairman Darren Royle – are waiting in the wings to pounce if the EFL flags up an issue.
To be fair Zakky, if anyone intends reading more than 5 articles a week, then they really should be forking out for the paper.
I posted the link, and anyone could have read it if they'd a mind to.
Totally agree with this king,awful journalism,and a lad on twitter who asked him to report facts and not heresay was blocked by him and the Wigan Today twitter!PatheticWe 'understand it may not be'
'it is believed'
'question marks over'
'It is not clear'
Kind of covering all bases there. Basically we are reporting rumours and don't really know anything. There was literally zero info in that article and just 'maybe it is and maybe it's not real'. It's pretty much click bait.
If you were the club journalist and apparently staff are being told to take a 30% pay cut - you must know some people at the club, wouldn't you check with them? You wouldn't need to publish their names but you could find out if the story is true or made it at the very least rather than just repeating what another paper said.
I fully agree ........which is why i don't bother looking unless I think there's likely to be some decent info .................... but in this case, like you say, the headline promised a lot more than it delivered.To be fair they put up a lot of articles with interesting headlines which turn out to have very little substance or that haven't already been reported elsewhere. So i can see why people click on more than 5 articles in the hope that they might find out something new or interesting but are left mostly disappointed and wouldn't want to risk paying for more of the same. If all the articles were good i'd agree with you though.
Totally agree with this king,awful journalism,and a lad on twitter who asked him to report facts and not heresay was blocked by him and the Wigan Today twitter!Pathetic
We 'understand it may not be'
'it is believed'
'question marks over'
'It is not clear'
Kind of covering all bases there. Basically we are reporting rumours and don't really know anything. There was literally zero info in that article and just 'maybe it is and maybe it's not real'. It's pretty much click bait.
If you were the club journalist and apparently staff are being told to take a 30% pay cut - you must know some people at the club, wouldn't you check with them? You wouldn't need to publish their names but you could find out if the story is true or made it at the very least rather than just repeating what another paper said.
Looks like Mr Kendricks done a training course at the BBCWe 'understand it may not be'
'it is believed'
'question marks over'
'It is not clear'
Kind of covering all bases there. Basically we are reporting rumours and don't really know anything. There was literally zero info in that article and just 'maybe it is and maybe it's not real'. It's pretty much click bait.
If you were the club journalist and apparently staff are being told to take a 30% pay cut - you must know some people at the club, wouldn't you check with them? You wouldn't need to publish their names but you could find out if the story is true or made it at the very least rather than just repeating what another paper said.
Wigan Today are reporting that there is 2pm meeting tomorrow with all the concerned parties, if they were still concerned over the funding surely they would still just be dealing wih the Spanish consortium.Nixon saying EFL being thorough and still asking questions and need answers on the funding.
Sounds like it's not as straightforward as you'd hope.
Looking like admins prediction for deal done by the end of month will be missed.
But I'm ok with that as I'd prefer the EFL to do it properly rather than what they did with Yeung which got us into this mess. If that means the deals collapses then that's good as we don't want to be back here in 12 months, if it passes but takes longer then we know the new owners should be legit.
Sounds a lot more positive reading that!Tomorrow is D-day ......
https://www.wigantoday.net/sport/football/thursday-d-day-wigan-athletic-3018265
I think that will mean all concerned parties in relation to the Spanish bid. Not those waiting in the wings.Wigan Today are reporting that there is 2pm meeting tomorrow with all the concerned parties, if they were still concerned over the funding surely they would still just be dealing wih the Spanish consortium.
Tomorrow is D-day ......
https://www.wigantoday.net/sport/football/thursday-d-day-wigan-athletic-3018265
Wigan Today are reporting that there is 2pm meeting tomorrow with all the concerned parties, if they were still concerned over the funding surely they would still just be dealing wih the Spanish consortium.