Ex-Ref
Vital Squad Member
I only have the iFollow commentary and Danny's after match interview to go on, but from those - we weathered a storm, conceded 60% possession in the first half and generally defended for a point in the standard DC way. Then we got a half-chance and worked the free-kick to take the lead.
What is interesting at this point is Danny's comment that, (and I paraphrase), "yes we have had success with this 'type' of free-kick, but we have a number of variations" and that is what teams can't deal with. This week's variation (from what I can see from the Sky highlights) is that 3 players argue about who should take it and where people should stand, and while the defence are concentrating on the amateur dramatics, rather than Eardley, he passes the ball down the channel - and we all know where that ended up.
From there we held on to half-time and then (I'm ignoring the Rovur 'um chance early in the second half) came the corner. Danny's comments were that Harry is very quick and given a standing start he can easily out run his marker. So if he starts outside the box (with a marker) and times his run with the corner taker, he will loose his marker and arrive at the designated point (where ever the rest of the team have left empty) before his marker and therefore have a good chance of having a free header.
From 2-0 Roverum are chasing the game and Lincoln can play a little football, keep a little possession and compete on a much more equal footing.
Did we have the better players? Maybe not. Did we have the strongest attack? Maybe not. Did we have the greater will to fight for each other? Yes. Did we have the better strategy? Probably.
I think we will have different strategies for different games and that we will win some ugly and some pretty and I don't give toss which works in which circumstance, as long as we keep grinding out the results.
Well, if opposition managers didn't know our tactics for certain, they do now. Any more juicy tit -bits for the Southend manager?