jeffs right
Vital Football Hero
Well question must be asked, 'why would Middlesbrough let him go?'Morsy wont save him, he's shite as well, both a pair of frauds, Cook will be sacked before bommy neet.
Well question must be asked, 'why would Middlesbrough let him go?'Morsy wont save him, he's shite as well, both a pair of frauds, Cook will be sacked before bommy neet.
Not really.I agree with most of that EV ... but your opening two sentences effectively underwrite what I said to WalgarthJohn .... that the away record was basically irrelevant given our finishing position.
Anyway, no point looking backwards ... I think we're all enjoying the achievements of the team, not to mention the commitment of the owner/Chairman.
Well question must be asked, 'why would Middlesbrough let him go?'
Be very surprised if he lasts the season. But I do think Morsy in the team will help him
I'm sure Jock will have a couple of excuses up his sleeve, he seems to have all the answers!
Oh for fuck’s sake!I also noticed Graham Barrows lad Jamie as part of the coaching setup on the bench on Saturday.
I didn't realise he had returned.
Would we have raised our game to the extent we did after those crooks dropped us in it? Who knows?Ahh right... the 18/19 season, the one which we started like a rocket, then probably due to his own managerial naiveties, started to play safe away from home with zero success.
We only started to go for it again away from home at Leeds on the Good Friday.
As for the administration season, I'm not blaming Cooky entirely, but whether you like it or not, he was a contributing factor.
Like I said, would the Dongers have pulled the trigger if we were on the verge of the play offs? ...Nobody can say for certain one way or the other, but the Big Bucks of the Premier League on the horizon would've probably been too tempting to pass up.
Anyways... all that's ancient history now, and like you said, going through all of that to get rid of the Dongers, and get Talal and his team in was probably (just about) worth the pain and suffering we went through.
Well question must be asked, 'why would Middlesbrough let him go?'
Their next 2 are Lincoln City (A) and Sheffield Wednesday (H).Well Sam made his debut tonight in his side's home defeat to West Ham's kids.
Apparently a brilliant classic demonstration of Cookism.
Despite using the 'gell' excuse for his side's pathetic start to the season an ideal opportunity was scorned tonight with many changes which is sending the Ipswich fans into a rage on social media.
Wouldn't wish him sacked but I would see Ipswich possibly as a promotion rival. While he is there it is keeping them out of the pack.Cooky didnt get sacked at Wigan he apparently resigned in a bid to save us money and thus survive. I sense some are willing Ipswich to lose for the wrong reasons.. Yes as rivals I want Ipswich to lose but it would give me no pleasure to see Cooky sacked
Who said he got sacked?Cooky didnt get sacked at Wigan he apparently resigned in a bid to save us money and thus survive. I sense some are willing Ipswich to lose for the wrong reasons.. Yes as rivals I want Ipswich to lose but it would give me no pleasure to see Cooky sacked
Morsy wont save him, he's shite as well, both a pair of frauds, Cook will be sacked before bommy neet.
Well Sam made his debut tonight in his side's home defeat to West Ham's kids.
Apparently a brilliant classic demonstration of Cookism.
Despite using the 'gell' excuse for his side's pathetic start to the season an ideal opportunity was scorned tonight with many changes which is sending the Ipswich fans into a rage on social media.
Make no mistake about it, that Ipswich team will take A LOT of gelling (maybe even longer than their Hierarchy are willing to give Cook).I often think 'gelling' is a bit of an excuse used to try and cover up coaching struggles.
Understandably a new team of players will improve as they get more familiar with each other I'd say that is gelling and fair enough.
But sometimes managers haven't got their players fit or organised, have picked wrong tactics etc and I think they throw that in as 'gelling' when it's not really about the players as they did as they were instructed.
For example when Moore, Lowe, Williams etc arrived a few years ago we adjusted our tactics and while the new players settling in was a factor, if we had established players those tactics would've seen them struggle also. When we started to play better some of the players had adapted better but the biggest difference was the change in tactics. So I think a teams struggles can passed off as the players gelling when the reality was the coaching staff at the time were making bad choices as they try and work out what they want to do with their new players. It's understandable a coach may need time to adjust and tinker with his side and the players adapt but I think that gelling is often putting more emphasis on the players when it's often more the coaches adapting.
I often think 'gelling' is a bit of an excuse used to try and cover up coaching struggles.
Understandably a new team of players will improve as they get more familiar with each other I'd say that is gelling and fair enough.
But sometimes managers haven't got their players fit or organised, have picked wrong tactics etc and I think they throw that in as 'gelling' when it's not really about the players as they did as they were instructed.
For example when Moore, Lowe, Williams etc arrived a few years ago we adjusted our tactics and while the new players settling in was a factor, if we had established players those tactics would've seen them struggle also. When we started to play better, some of the players had adapted better but the biggest difference was the change in tactics. So I think a team's struggles can be passed off as the players gelling, when the reality was the coaching staff at the time were making bad choices as they try and work out what they want to do with their new players. It's understandable a coach may need time to adjust and tinker with his side and the players adapt, but I think that gelling is often putting more emphasis on the players when it's often more the coaches adapting.
Talking of tinkering, do you think when Kerr is fully fit we will go with three at the back and play with wing backs ?
Let's hope not. Left back and right back should be as they are defenders. Wing backs can possibly work if you have top notch players. At our level it's crap.Talking of tinkering, do you think when Kerr is fully fit we will go with three at the back and play with wing backs ?