Forest v Liverpool Match thread sponsored by Smokey Robinson 😂

[mao tse tung]

I used to think I had a system for beating the casino

Wait til red comes up 8 times ish in a row then keep betting black and double up each time if you lose etc

It doesn't work

Red can come up again and again regardless what happened before

Bad luck in the last game has nothing to do with previous games

We aren't taking chances so bad luck when things don't work out for us just costs us more and stands out more

You don't question every decision when you are getting results. You don't have to!!

It's made far worse by the fact every point we are losing seriously matters

Is there a conspiracy where our players are deliberately missing chances and fookin up at the back as well?

Or is it just the league and the refs who are in on the conspiracy?

The league and refs couldn't make us lose without the help of Elanga and Awoniyi on the weekend?

I would agree with most of that, particularly about the conspiracy bollocks.

But that does not mean we have not been subjected to gross incompetence, and that is exactly what it is.

And we are not the only Club in that boat.

The Referees in this league cannot even get VAR decisions correct with the benefit of Gods knows how many replays.

It's pretty fucking ironic that the "best league" in the World should have the worst standard of refereeing.

Non of the foreign leagues experience the woeful standards we do on anything like the same regularity.

Problem is, the people running the game in this Country are too fucking arrogant to admit there is a problem.

 

[ZedRed]

Watching the game also reveals how far the scouse posts (in the comments after the BBC Sport match report) twisted things - two Forest players booked in stoppage time so we were only interested in timewasting and a late winner for them was 'karma'

- when the shot hit Yates in the head, their player sportingly gave us the ball back but we still got the drop ball (This seems bizarre, but 2 or 3 people said it - are they deliberately ignoring the whistle going while the ball was in the area?)

- they should have had a penalty for Danilo on Danns but our keeper went down very easily against Danns, who is 5 stone wet through

-Yates kicked Konate in the head (one person said it should have been a red card)

Danns deliberately headbutted Sels.

 

[ZedRed]

I would agree with most of that, particularly about the conspiracy bollocks.

But that does not mean we have not been subjected to gross incompetence, and that is exactly what it is.

And we are not the only Club in that boat.

The Referees in this league cannot even get VAR decisions correct with the benefit of Gods knows how many replays.

It's pretty fucking ironic that the "best league" in the World should have the worst standard of refereeing.

Non of the foreign leagues experience the woeful standards we do on anything like the same regularity.

Problem is, the people running the game inthis Country are too fucking arrogant to admit their is a problem.

I saw Clattenburg used to be head of the Egyptian version of PGMOL and the performance by the Egyptian referee during the South Africa-Nigeria game is the best refereeing performance I've seen since the introduction of VAR.

Perhaps Clattenburg should be telling PGMOL what they need to do as they're all either incompetent or completely bent.

 

[radfordinlondon]

The thing is, the people who can vouch for his alibi are the building supervisor and a motorcycle cop. Not many other employees could claim that level of authority for their alibis.

The cop allegedly saw pigeons take flight from the Book Depository roof, deduced shots had come from an upper floor, and ran into the building. He immediately found the supervisor and they ran upstairs together.

Seeing movement behind a frosted glass door on the second floor, the cop pushed it open and challenged Oswald (standing by the drinks machine with a bottle of Coke in his hand). The supervisor said 'It's OK, he works here', told Oswald the president had been shot, and the two carried on upstairs.

The two women ran down from the 4th floor as soon as they saw the shooting. Their boss stood at the door by the staircase and watched them pass the cop and supervisor who were on the way up. The Warren Commission studiously ignored these witnesses but they were tracked down much later and confirmed their stories.

I'd say it was physically impossible for LHO to run the length of the sixth floor and down to the second floor before these two women emerged on the 4th floor. He certainly wasn't on the staircase after they ran down. Eliminate the impossible, and whatever remains must be true.

I've said b4 but I can say again. Lyndon b Johnson had JFK assassinated. there was even, very briefly indeed, a book published in America before being pulled.

all laid out. I know a person who worked for govt who has a copy. it will all come out in the wash one day.

 

[Apollyon]

I know who killed JFK but it's all hush hush, and I for one do not wish to be found propped up against a tree atop Bramcote Hills, with a suicide note.

I suggest you drop this now. More than the red tops are WATCHING

 

[ZedRed]

I know who killed JFK but it's all hush hush, and I for one do not wish to be found propped up against a tree atop Bramcote Hills, with a suicide note.

I suggest you drop this now. More than the red tops are WATCHING

I bet you've been propped up against a tree atop Bramcote Hills before but in different circumstances...........

 

[AdebolaCornflakes]

I bet you've been propped up against a tree atop Bramcote Hills before but in different circumstances...........

Can confirm

 

[Geedo61]

I'm a bit of a nerd when it comes to shooting because I did a bit back in the day. The rifle used was a bolt action of dubious quality. Two head shots at a target moving away from him at the distance given in the enquiry is a bit more than " very impressive ".

I am into these conspiracy theories!
If the Americans landed on the moon over 50 years ago, with the advances in technology over the last half a century - How come there have been so many failed attempts and then absolute escasty of the recent successful landing?
Was this the first bit of American fake news?

 

[ZedRed]

I am into these conspiracy theories!
If the Americans landed on the moon over 50 years ago, with the advances in technology over the last half a century - How come there have been so many failed attempts and then absolute escasty of the recent successful landing?
Was this the first bit of American fake news?

I'm not sure if the technology existed in 1969 to execute a moon landing but I'm just speculating as I'm by no means an expert.

 

[Feco]

I'm not sure if the technology existed in 1969 to execute a moon landing but I'm just speculating as I'm by no means an expert.

The propulsion technology is not hugely different today, and I’m pretty sure that if the boffins could technically make something ‘fly’ then there where people around that would be able to do so.
For landings I think people still trump autonomous systems, particularly in unknown terrain.

I think it was Bozzi who always doubted that rockets/space stations existed. I worked for a while in Florida, and certainly saw a few launches and landings….or maybe I was being deceived by alien space lizards or VAR?

 

[ZedRed]

The propulsion technology is not hugely different today, and I’m pretty sure that if the boffins could technically make something ‘fly’ then there where people around that would be able to do so.
For landings I think people still trump autonomous systems, particularly in unknown terrain.

I think it was Bozzi who always doubted that rockets/space stations existed. I worked for a while in Florida, and certainly saw a few launches and landings….or maybe I was being deceived by alien space lizards or VAR?

Sorry. To clarify, I was talking about man operated space landings. But yeah. I'm not an expert. Just strange why it hasn't been done since.

 

[in_the_top_one]

Sorry. To clarify, I was talking about man operated space landings. But yeah. I'm not an expert. Just strange why it hasn't been done since.

They've put people on the moon six times not to mention several more landings where samples were collected and returned. It wasn't just a one-off with Neil and Buzz.

 

[BlackGold]

I'm not sure if the technology existed in 1969 to execute a moon landing but I'm just speculating as I'm by no means an expert.

Apparently, the Moon isn't made of rock and whenever it appears in the night sky it is not through reflecting the Sun's light.

Rather, it has an internal light source.

 

[Ingy]

I know who killed JFK but it's all hush hush, and I for one do not wish to be found propped up against a tree atop Bramcote Hills, with a suicide note.

That reminds me chap, do you want your Kajagoogoo tape back chap?

 

[Feco]

Sorry. To clarify, I was talking about man operated space landings. But yeah. I'm not an expert. Just strange why it hasn't been done since.

It’s a question worth asking.
The Saturn 5’s were hugely expensive to fly, and I think that was an issue.
I also think that NASA realised that to populate the moon, they needed to understand how to live in space, the ISS had helped that process hugely.

I’ve been very fortunate to see a couple of shuttle launches, an Atlas 5 and a couple of Falcon’s.
For all that watching Discovery land was breathtaking..it really was falling with style.

If you ever go to Florida, if you do nothing else, visit Kennedy Space Centre. It is fantastic.

 

[CornishForest]

I am into these conspiracy theories!
If the Americans landed on the moon over 50 years ago, with the advances in technology over the last half a century - How come there have been so many failed attempts and then absolute escasty of the recent successful landing?
Was this the first bit of American fake news?

Cost and politics.
It’s extremely expensive to leave the orbit of Earth..
The main reason the USA went to the moon was to win the Space Race. Up to that point Russia was winning and Communism could not be seen to be that successful.
Once it was won it became harder to justify the cost.
The future of space exploration lies in the private sector, once it becomes profitable it will explode.

 

[Phatnovice]

Cost and politics.
It’s extremely expensive to leave the orbit of Earth..
The main reason the USA went to the moon was to win the Space Race. Up to that point Russia was winning and Communism could not be seen to be that successful.
Once it was won it became harder to justify the cost.
The future of space exploration lies in the private sector, once it becomes profitable it will explode.

let's hope not...

 

[Barry Goldie]

If you ever go to Florida, if you do nothing else, visit Kennedy Space Centre. It is fantastic.

Second that, been to Florida twice, been to Kennedy twice.By far the best thing there. Thankfully got away with Disney 0.

 

[CanadaRed]

I like Florida and I love science. Many moons ago, pun intended, I collected soup can wrappers, sent them off to get posters of the Apollo 8 mission photos. I would go to Kennedy tomorrow but until that twat DeSantis fucks off and gets eaten by a gator in the everglades, I am never going back to spend my hard earned money in Florida.

 

[ZedRed]

It’s a question worth asking.
The Saturn 5’s were hugely expensive to fly, and I think that was an issue.
I also think that NASA realised that to populate the moon, they needed to understand how to live in space, the ISS had helped that process hugely.

I’ve been very fortunate to see a couple of shuttle launches, an Atlas 5 and a couple of Falcon’s.
For all that watching Discovery land was breathtaking..it really was falling with style.

If you ever go to Florida, if you do nothing else, visit Kennedy Space Centre. It is fantastic.

The only time I've seen a shuttle launch (and I was a fair distance away) it blew up.