They paid for a trip to Dubai which benefited us massively didnt it...
Was Hutchings any good? Just out of interest, what were your opinions of him as a manager?
I think this pretty much sums up the debate.
he got sacked very quickly but he had signed some good players, just couldnt get them to play. So no he was a poor manager
As opposed to Hutchings KDZ, surely the comparators should be Rosler and Caldwell.
Previously successful, but subsequently struggling.
Personally, I'd have given both more time.
For your information "Mr Morris" has been ill and not on line, except fleetingly. So do not presume to know everythingThat's bollocks. I often say I hope I'm proven wrong and have said so when I have been. Sadly I'm not often wrong in regards these matters.
You often get some of the clappers going on about hindsight when reality dawns, some of them just slink away. Speaking of which, what's happened to Mr Morris and The Chat?
........ i was saying how the replacement performs will change the legacy of their predecessor. .......
Should we have kept Hutchins, Coyle, Malky or Joyce on for longer as they may have done a Fergie if given longer too.
Malky was previously successful. Would you have given him more time?As opposed to Hutchings KDZ, surely the comparators should be Rosler and Caldwell.
Previously successful, but subsequently struggling.
Personally, I'd have given both more time.
Malky was previously successful. Would you have given him more time?.........
........Rosler had completely lost the dressing room. I’ll never forget James McClean hanging around the away end at Bournemouth after being left out, telling anyone who would listen that no one had a clue what the manager was doing. That’s why I’ll never hold him in the esteem other fans seem to.
Where does it say a problem? Was it beneficial? NO. Why would people suggest the playing squad going watching Liverpool and it to be paid for by the club, when alot of Evertonians in the club aswell...What is your problem with that trip the manager requested and they agreed.
No. The "previously successful" comment was within the context of their time with Wigan. ie the previous season.
Players aren't angels. Had he lost the whole dressing room, the majority, or just one or two influential (shit stirring?) players? No idea. I understand why he went ..... I was at that Bolton game. Maybe though, on reflection, it may have been better releasing a couple of the players instead.
McManaman always lays well against Bolton when he starts. ...........
Was Hutchings any good? Just out of interest, what were your opinions of him as a manager?
He seemed a nice guy, had a good positive attitude which was very refreshing after Jewell became very negative and defeatist by the end, made some good ambitious signings early in the summer like Sibieski, Bramble, Granqvist, Brown, Koumas (who was the best player outside the Prem at the time) and we started pretty well with 2 wins and a draw in the first 4 and went top of the Prem for a day or so at one point.
He had some diabolical bad luck in the following few games we had Kilbane sent off at Newcastle for literally winning a header in possibly the worst sending off i can ever remember, we lost against Reading with Koumas hitting the bar multiple times, we lost to Liverpool with a Bent goal being wrongly ruled offside and Agahowa missing an open goal from about 1 yard if i'm remembering correctly.
After that we went to Man U and got utterly battered where we made zero attempt to attack them and it became very apparent that at the back we were very disorganised and in the following few games we just couldn't keep the goals out. The confidence was going and Hutch didn't seem to be able to fix the flaws in our game. He lost another few and then went after a spirited defeat to Chelsea.
I really liked him as a person, he gave it a good go and he deserved a bit more luck than he got in some games but ultimately the writing was on the wall - he was out of his depth and you can't keep a manager on because you like them if they aren't good enough so it was absolutely the right thing to move him on when we did. Fair play to the club - they realised their mistake and put it right asap rather than kicking the can down the road and letting it fester into a deep crisis - like we have this time. Good no2s rarely make good no1s and it was the wrong appointment in the first place - but at least it allowed us to get Bruce in and that first year Bruce was in charged that spanned accross the second half of the 07/08 season and start of the 08/09 was probably one of the most enjoyable watching Latics - we were bloody good until Palacios went and Bruce seemed to throw a strop and couldn't be arsed anymore.
I was told that by a member of staff who was in and around the training and dressing room, believe me or don't i'm not really bothered, but the person had no reason to make it upWasn't Holt not in the dressing room, training with the kids when he was here and out on loan most of the time?
No doubt Rosler and Holt didn't get on but i've got to be honest i don't think Holt would be around the 1st team enough to lead any rebellion.
Kdz why do you describe our current predicament as a deep crisis?
Ipswich are in deep crisis Bolton are in deep crisis.
We haven't been bottom 3 all season and even though our form has been really poor we're still in with a very good chance of staying up.
I still think Cook is the right man for the job and will get things right. Personally I think he is struggling with trying to balance attacking and defending and has gone too cautious.
But with a nearly full squad to choose from the balance will come.
It's no coincidence that GC had the same issues after being an attacking force the previous season. So maybe the league is harder than we think and even the struggling teams have that bit more experience and quality than we have.
With Peter Reid and Joe Royle in the background I'm sure Cook must pick their brains even though they're both Evertonians ?.