radfordinlondon
Vital Football Legend
Strange how lots of right wing commentators reckon BBC is biased against them. Wonder who is right...?
Both of em
Strange how lots of right wing commentators reckon BBC is biased against them. Wonder who is right...?
'Trade agreements that have been signed'...
Andean countries
CARIFORUM trade bloc
Central America
Chile
Eastern and Southern Africa (ESA) trade bloc
Faroe Islands
Georgia
Iceland and Norway
Israel
Jordan
Kosovo
Lebanon
Liechtenstein
Morocco
Pacific states
Palestinian Authority
South Korea
Southern Africa Customs Union and Mozambique (SACUM) trade bloc
Switzerland
Tunisia
So, are you saying these trade agreements that have been signed have not actually been signed? Just want to draw a line under this.
Remain promised a recession and mass unemployment. I'm not demanding they apologise for those incorrect predictions.
Could that be because they are reasonably balanced in as much as they can be? That would be a shocker!Both of em
Our government said exactly the above. Along with the IMF and the BOE .
There's a few for starters.
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/...ost-if-it-left-eu-new-treasury-analysis-shows
Speaking at B&Q in Eastleigh, Hampshire, the Prime Minister and Chancellor set out the Treasury’s analysis of the impact on the nation’s economy over the immediate period of two years following a vote to leave.
This analysis shows that such a decision would cause an immediate and profound economic shock across the country, creating instability and uncertainty which would be made worse by the complex negotiations that would follow to agree the terms of Britain’s exit from the EU and its new relationship with the rest of Europe.
Echoing the recent warnings from the independent Bank of England and the International Monetary Fund, the central conclusion of the Treasury’s new analysis is that the effect of this profound shock would be to push the UK into recession and lead to a sharp rise in unemployment.
Could that be because they are reasonably balanced in as much as they can be? That would be a shocker!
I have always subscribed to the theory that if the extremes of both sides are crying out that there is bias then the reality is more than likely that they are being relatively even handed.They make mistakes, alot! but they attempt to offer both sides and thats what counts imo. People should try tv in other countries. To date the US remains the worst imo.
Erm we are in a recession and have unprecedented mass unemployment.
We were looking on course for recession back in jan, the virus has just made it worse.
The analysis was based on brexit happening- as has been pointed out- brexit has not yet been fully agreed or implemented, we have merely left and are in a transition period.
Well, you would expect the economy to mirror the transition and it was. We were haemorrhaging investment and jobs before the virus.
tStilton cheese and Melton Pork Pie....half way to heaven....
t
With a bottle of scotch in the other hand t
They were partly right.Our government said exactly the above. Along with the IMF and the BOE .
There's a few for starters.
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/...ost-if-it-left-eu-new-treasury-analysis-shows
Speaking at B&Q in Eastleigh, Hampshire, the Prime Minister and Chancellor set out the Treasury’s analysis of the impact on the nation’s economy over the immediate period of two years following a vote to leave.
This analysis shows that such a decision would cause an immediate and profound economic shock across the country, creating instability and uncertainty which would be made worse by the complex negotiations that would follow to agree the terms of Britain’s exit from the EU and its new relationship with the rest of Europe.
Echoing the recent warnings from the independent Bank of England and the International Monetary Fund, the central conclusion of the Treasury’s new analysis is that the effect of this profound shock would be to push the UK into recession and lead to a sharp rise in unemployment.
They were partly right.
There was a profound economic shock and the pound plummeted.
No, there was no recession; because article 50 was not triggered for nearly 9 months and companies decided to wait and see what the plans were
I know that; but the erroneous assumption was that companies would immediately jump ship.There was no recession after article 50 was triggered either. So that caveat isn’t required.
The pound fell because many believed project fear and Carney. Within weeks it had recovered most losses. The economy continued to stay robust in face of remoaners and doomsayers. Unlike the EU economy that continued in downward spiral, gdp, exports, employment and confidence. I thought history was your thing?
The pound fell because many believed project fear and Carney. Within weeks it had recovered most losses. The economy continued to stay robust in face of remoaners and doomsayers. Unlike the EU economy that continued in downward spiral, gdp, exports, employment and confidence. I thought history was your thing?
It is.The pound fell because many believed project fear and Carney. Within weeks it had recovered most losses. The economy continued to stay robust in face of remoaners and doomsayers. Unlike the EU economy that continued in downward spiral, gdp, exports, employment and confidence. I thought history was your thing?