Which bits are opinions.
Poole played the bulk of the games after Xmas at right back not TJ
TJ didn't play as a Centre Half when all four candidates were fit.
Which of those are not correct.
I have not offered my opinion on the defensive players just facts.
Yours are opinions.
For what it's worth - my "opinion" is that TJ will be a Championship standard CH quite soon.
Which makes the rest of us buying TJ very unlikely - because Spurs will know this and his value... and it would be very surprising if we could afford that.
He is a centre back and he is already terrific!!I thought TJ performed brilliantly at Centre Back towards the end of last season. He was composed, had plenty of time on the ball. He made it look easy. Personally if we could sign him permanently i would look to play him there and develop him into a terrific young centre back.
Appelton did explicitly state that TJs numbers were going down and he was starting to burn out in a very intense packed season for a player who hasn't played that much mens football before. He said it a few times to explain TJs absence so I don't understand why that means he thought other players were 'better?
Pointless if so. Poole is our player and will be benefitting from a preseason.smells like a tj vs poole off piste is brewing.
Pointless if so. Poole is our player and will be benefitting from a preseason.
TJ isn't our player, and if rested and fully recharged, his progress last season would suggest his next step should be a Championship loan if hes not seen as ready for Spurs' first team squad.
I'd be gobsmacked, though delighted, if TJ appeared again in an Imps shirt.
Absolutely. I just dont think it will be happen, and will be delighted to be proven wrong.pointless until eyoma signs?
I try to choose my words carefully.
I think TJ would be an amazing signing.
I just find it hard to believe.
Poole arrived in January and played 22 league games. That is fairly cast iron proof Poole was ahead of TJ at right back in MA's view.
TJ is a centre half, who made a really good fist playing out of position at RB.
The confusion in some people's minds is due to the fact that a handful of other people don't rate Poole.
But if Poole was rated by MA infront of TJ at RB, their view is plainly bonkers.
TJ being slightly behind an excellent right back doesn't make TJ a mediocre centre half with little potential.
Akinde and Hopper both rumoured to have cost £150,000.Certainly is an investment
What’s our record fee atm I’d guess it’ll be for Akinde ?
Absolutely. I just dont think it will be happen, and will be delighted to be proven wrong.
"Attributions"my dear friend. A classic thinking error. For those unable to see a number of other explanations for a course of action or conduct.Which bits are opinions.
Poole played the bulk of the games after Xmas at right back not TJ
TJ didn't play as a Centre Half when all four candidates were fit.
Which of those are not correct.
I have not offered my opinion on the defensive players just facts.
Yours are opinions.
For what it's worth - my "opinion" is that TJ will be a Championship standard CH quite soon.
Which makes the rest of us buying TJ very unlikely - because Spurs will know this and his value... and it would be very surprising if we could afford that.
Spurs have two players ahead of him , one of them is younger than him.Pointless if so. Poole is our player and will be benefitting from a preseason.
TJ isn't our player, and if rested and fully recharged, his progress last season would suggest his next step should be a Championship loan if hes not seen as ready for Spurs' first team squad.
I'd be gobsmacked, though delighted, if TJ appeared again in an Imps shirt.
Think their cash him in price might be a bit rich for Lincoln.Spurs have two players ahead of him , one of them is younger than him.
Maybe they will cash him in, soon find out I guess.
… it’s a free country so go for it but ‘bare’ in mind children and people in Grimsby may be watchingoh it would have been Yeovil but they appeared to have all closed and are online only. Does that mean I need to put a picture of my arse on the Internet?
I'll admit the "facts" were put there to provoke, but seeing has you did, I will go with your classic thinking error theory."Attributions"my dear friend. A classic thinking error. For those unable to see a number of other explanations for a course of action or conduct.