Their choice.They have to earn money to live as they no longer receive money from Charles
Its what they wanted.
Their choice.They have to earn money to live as they no longer receive money from Charles
Beat me to it again you bugger.In their desperate quest for anonymity Harry has done a major podcast!
Attacking the 1st amendment, great move!
https://www.express.co.uk/news/roya...rkle-duke-of-sussex-latest-news-update-attack
The article seems to have all the right wingers up in arms, which is interesting.
In their desperate quest for anonymity Harry has done a major podcast!
Attacking the 1st amendment, great move!
https://www.express.co.uk/news/roya...rkle-duke-of-sussex-latest-news-update-attack
The article seems to have all the right wingers up in arms, which is interesting.
Yep, no doubt he already has enough money to live a normal life without having to get a normal job.Have Brits not learned over the years, going to America and telling them what to do just isn’t going to get you anywhere?
I also saw calls for him to give up his title. After his little tantrum against his father, who has only recently buried his father, I completely agree they should lose all the titles they seem keen to keep for personal financial reasons probably.
If he hates the goldfish bowl and institution, wouldn’t the titles be the first thing you’d want to lose anyway?
In their desperate quest for anonymity Harry has done a major podcast!
Attacking the 1st amendment, great move!
https://www.express.co.uk/news/roya...rkle-duke-of-sussex-latest-news-update-attack
The article seems to have all the right wingers up in arms, which is interesting.
I thought he was taken out of context a little tbh but I also read the initial thing thru Pierce Morgans lens so I naturally took the gingers side. We know Pierce is obsessed with Meghan.
Then again perhaps we should give a shit, because this is the same bent BBC that covered up for that vile paedo Jimmy Saville.An interview Diana, Princess of Wales, gave to the BBC's Panorama programme more than 20 years ago is now the subject of an independent inquiry led by Lord Dyson, a very senior former judge.
The central claim - made by Diana's brother, Earl Spencer - is that Mr Bashir lied to get the interview with Princess Diana.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/explainers-57163815
I don't (and never will) give a shit about a 'news story' from almost 30 years ago, particularly one about the Royal Family.Then again perhaps we should give a shit, because this is the same bent BBC that covered up for that vile paedo Jimmy Saville.
What else has the national broadcaster, who we are all obliged to fund, covered up.
Your choice.I don't (and never will) give a shit about a 'news story' from almost 30 years ago, particularly one about the Royal Family.
In their desperate quest for anonymity Harry has done a major podcast!
Attacking the 1st amendment, great move!
https://www.express.co.uk/news/roya...rkle-duke-of-sussex-latest-news-update-attack
The article seems to have all the right wingers up in arms, which is interesting.
I listened to the podcast and didn't have a problem with what he said. The first amendment is freedom of speech after all and I wasn't offended, however I also don't have the annoying hobby that the majority of Americans have, getting offended at everything they don't 100% agree with. Who knows, maybe it's because I'm a ginger too.
Yeah, and fair enough, but to go to a new country and start on your opinions that quick is a bit cheesy at the very least, but really, pretty rude. Maybe that is how they are both going to progress in life, be rent-a-quotes!
It's quite American to go to a new country and spout off your opinions. Hell, most Americans have never been to another country and still have no issues spouting off their opinions and how they would be a better place if they were more like 'merica.
What a monumental waste of resources.An interview Diana, Princess of Wales, gave to the BBC's Panorama programme more than 20 years ago is now the subject of an independent inquiry led by Lord Dyson, a very senior former judge.
The central claim - made by Diana's brother, Earl Spencer - is that Mr Bashir lied to get the interview with Princess Diana.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/explainers-57163815