Very unnecessary parting remarks from SE.
Why he's being honest about Rees ability
Very unnecessary parting remarks from SE.
Tact is not your forte eitherWhy he's being honest about Rees ability
To me it looks like Rees has maybe found a club in the Conference National and that’s why Evans said that. Otherwise I’ve no idea why he would. Everything else he said was very complimentary.
Then he could have said "he will be a real asset to the right club" rather than "Conference National Level". Conference National isn't even the top Conference league, that is Conference Premier - Conference National is 3 leagues below where he is playing at the moment.
Don't agree about the waste of money comment. We are quick to criticise our management for missing yet another NL or L2 player who joins a club (like Peterborough for example) and subsequently goes on to bigger and better things and/or produces income for that club. Rees had a good record at Bromley and was worth a punt and I hope that we will continue to look at signing players with possible potential even though it often doesn't come off.Rees was obviously a signing indicative of the budget. We could afford an established National League player (wages), but not an established League 2/ League 1 player at the time.
It’s unfortunate for him as he’s done nothing wrong, but overall I suppose other than his last minute winner at Burton, he’s been a waste of money.
Funny how you demand ‘ total loyalty ‘ from a club then the manger and
He's re joined BromleyContract cancelled by mutual consent.
I must say I don't like this freezing out and removal of players one iota.
So the money wasn’t wasted because there was a slim chance he might have been good?Don't agree about the waste of money comment. We are quick to criticise our management for missing yet another NL or L2 player who joins a club (like Peterborough for example) and subsequently goes on to bigger and better things and/or produces income for that club. Rees had a good record at Bromley and was worth a punt and I hope that we will continue to look at signing players with possible potential even though it often doesn't come off.
No it wasn't wasted except for the benefit of hindsight. In effect the Club is taking a punt with every player we sign. Some will not work out. If we worried about wastes of money then we'd never sign anyone.So the money wasn’t wasted because there was a slim chance he might have been good?
Even though he turned out not to be?
I don't know if you are working. But if you had a boss tell you were not wanted .And he pointed out other jobs you could take in the paper that were less important perhaps with a pay cut would take one of them ?On the few occasions i saw him play i also thought he was crap.
The player had two or three offers to move on recently and decided, for whatever reason, not to take them.
If a manager says "you're not wanted" why would you hang around with 3 offers to go? He probably wanted his contract paid up and then he could take another deal elsewhere and have more money than he did to start with!
I think Evans has been honest and i cannot criticise him for that.
He's a conference player who has gone back to his old club.
A punt was taken and it failed.
To me it looks like Rees has maybe found a club in the Conference National and that’s why Evans said that. Otherwise I’ve no idea why he would. Everything else he said was very complimentary.
Really I’m surprised about that, I thought he’d get at least 6 months wages as a settlement.Lancs Evans hadn’t a clue where he was going all that he was interested in was getting him off the wages bill. Also scally doesn’t pay up the rest of their contract. He justifies it by saying we will mutually tear up your existing one and not attach a fee to the player