Well, I'd say the wage was absolute bollocks for a start and plenty of other sites - more well known (at least to me) but equally unreliable carry wildly different figures.
However, The Herald is pretty reputable in most cases. But it's state owned and was very favourable of Mugabi (for obvious Putin/Russia reasons) and the ruling party but I can absolutely believe they have a contact to Naky because he's a boy done good story and does lots of charity work back at home.
Problem I have, the original report reads like a Sun exclusive. Lots of big claims, no substance. Whilst they pick up on Naky's lack of recent game time, they pay no real mind to the Boobie signing (Iroegbunam's development) and even suggest we wanted him to extend his contract past 2024 before we let him out on loan this summer. The only time they address Boobie is by saying effectively when he was signed, Naky lost his place - which patently isn't true.
It's also an incredibly repetitive article, restating the same claims for no other reason than word count and despite having an unnamed source, they quote them and then paraphrase the lot anyway to make it a more bulky piece.
I'd call horseshit 100% as the report can't even get the basics right and it's absolutely illogical to suggest after signing Boobie and Denny we'd demand a bit part player signs an extension with the inevitable raise before he leaves on loan - when he has two years left (and there may be the standard 12 months on top) anyway.
I stand by my thoughts ahead of bothering to read it. It's also why I only ever loosely scan this thread and most of the time when I do cover speculation now, I'm pointing out why it's pointless bollocks and won't happen and only show a more mild interest when it's likely to be true.
Not what some wet wipe in another country wibbles that a website, rarely run by reputable journalists, repeats and references in this country because they have a daily article count to meet or they'd get the sack.