Beg to differ mate. Hackerschoor and Paulaner on draft.
Love the range of ales at the man of kent and the barman does a cracking range of gin and tonics.
Looking forward to getting back down there. I hope it opens post lockdown, not sure every pub will
Just read that. "Robust opponents. Relentless aggression". According to the stats we committed 5 more fouls and got two more bookings and I'm pretty sure O'Keefe's was for dissent and O'Connor's was for a non existent foul. Whatever a good point and despite them having some good chances Bonham wasn't that busy against top of the league and on another day we could have won it.Anyone else read the BBC report on our game - what a load of old bollocks.
For all those who believe in "dispassionate" reporting by the press on any other subjects, well just read this and carry on believing about an impartial press. You have just witnessed the game, does this report your interpretation (how many fouls in the penalty area were then on Oliver that went unpunished) ?
Well done Buddha
Anyone else read the BBC report on our game - what a load of old bollocks.
For all those who believe in "dispassionate" reporting by the press on any other subjects, well just read this and carry on believing about an impartial press. You have just witnessed the game, does this report your interpretation (how many fouls in the penalty area were then on Oliver that went unpunished) ?
Well done Buddha
That's excellent JokermanAbsolutely,
They never list the fouls on Gills and they list every single "foul" on Hull players without noting that most of them involved kicking themselves, tripping over their boot laces, and and just plain falling over. The most you see is a small print retraction days later on page seven. And then...ok we scored a goal, fair enough, but who started the scoring? They don't note that. And what are we supposed to do when they start scoring goals? You have to look long and hard before you find out what actually happened. No wonder we set fire to their changing rooms...did we?
The thing I enjoy the most is that the commentators/pundits of all the league "giants" repeatedly say how they "know how Gillingham are going to play" that "they always seem to have a plan to counteract our hoofball" and finally, that old addage "there is no way we should ever lose to this team".......AND YET: they all seem to be surprised, ending up looking like the proverbial rabbit, when we play our pressing game. their plans to counteract out style of play only seems to work some of the time and we have whupped or at least drawn with most of these footballing giants.Absolutely,
They never list the fouls on Gills and they list every single "foul" on Hull players without noting that most of them involved kicking themselves, tripping over their boot laces, and and just plain falling over. The most you see is a small print retraction days later on page seven. And then...ok we scored a goal, fair enough, but who started the scoring? They don't note that. And what are we supposed to do when they start scoring goals? You have to look long and hard before you find out what actually happened. No wonder we set fire to their changing rooms...did we?
Yeh, like watching a team of Jacksons.I stuck with the England game for 50 minutes then gave up due to boredom.
All I thought was chuck it in the box ffs
That’s a brilliant analogyIts modern woke football. The first aim is to cancel the other team out lol.
If there had been fans in the stadium, I wouldn't have been surprised if England's safe but slow chess like possession football prompted calls of "It's just like watching MK Dons".
As SE said after beating MKD, I am not sure I could watch that every week.
If there had been fans in the stadium, I wouldn't have been surprised if England's safe but slow chess like possession football prompted calls of "It's just like watching MK Dons".
As SE said after beating MKD, I am not sure I could watch that every week.