And as I have said numerous times, we ignored it and have done a Fulham.
We haven't done a Fulham, they didn't have to replace 50-60% of the squad yet chose to. As for Man City blueprint I was on about investment/growth worldwide, I can confidently argue in yr 1/2 they did a Fulham with the likes of Robinho etc.
We have brought in an average manager, and largely unknown players from abroad with no PL experience.
This isn't a rebuild, it is a waste.
And no, of course we couldn't be the finished product this quickly.
A manager known for working and getting the best on a shoestring, and whilst at Brentford knowing he had to work 24 months ahead because his best players would be sold from underneath him every year once they had a proper value.
He also had Rosler/Warburton's work to lean on with the system fully in place in the way Benham operates.
We had nothing, you're right when you say we wouldn't have gone bust, but given all the hocking Xia was doing to keep the lights on we could've very easily gone into admin and as you know yourself, the Academy was being sacrificed.
It's a rebuild. Some players will work, others won't, others will take longer to settle.
It's where we are. No point being frustrated. We could've brought experience, paid twice as much and had the next round of Collins and Dunne et al. The way we didn't go, isn't automatically a better option.
I meant the finished product crack to mean if Purslow/Suso/Smith don't act in January they sign their own P45s.