Fair enough but I'm not. Not quite.
No, no, no. You've completely misunderstood me. Now I get why you responded the way you did.
I wasn't asking you to comment on the actual cases or the media speculation.
Rightly or wrongly (almost certainly wrongly) the public are influenced by media speculation and tittle tattle. Lots of people believe that Jeremy Corbyn is an anti-Semite and terrorist sympathiser simply because of what the media has told them. Lots of people think all travellers are anti-social and leave a mess based upon what the media tells them. Ffs, some people even still associate David Cameron with pig-fucking! None of these things are true but have become, in the minds of some or even many, a perception.
There is absolutely no denying that the police have, earlier this year, been found by an independent Inquiry, to be "institutionally corrupt". That is a fact. No matter how unpleasant, it is not my opinion, it is a fact.
https://www.occrp.org/en/daily/14662-inquiry-brands-london-police-institutionally-corrupt
The accusations of mysogyny are only that, accusations. This hasn't been proven.
Nevertheless, as pointed out above, sometimes (often) mud sticks and a perception is formed in the minds of some or many of the public.
My question to you was how you would respond to a normal citizen (one you didn't know to be an anarchist or suspect to hold anti-police sentiments) who, having read the plethora of media reports relating to mysogyny within the police force, happened to be concerned by what they had read? How would you reassure those people, especially women?
This is a fair point. All I can say is that you've told me before that you're not a racist but neither are you an anti-racist. I'm not a police hater but neither am I an anti-police hater.
Incidentally, I don't think you're racist. I hope you know that I'm not a police hater.
I am genuinely sorry you felt my post was condescending. I honestly didn't mean it to be so. Up to you whether or not you believe me about that or not though.