Other Clubs News Discussion Thread 2 | Page 3152 | Vital Football

Other Clubs News Discussion Thread 2

sirdennis said:
Chelsea must be in breach , even with their 8 year contract scam.
Click to expand...

The problem for them is that they are going to have to sell some of these lads of the stupidly long contracts and sell them for a lot less than you paid for them.

So ok you pay Shaktar 10m a year for 8 years for Mudryk but if you then sell him for 30m after a couple of years because he's not lived up to expectations then they still have to pay Shaktar.
 
JW1985 said:
The problem for them is that they are going to have to sell some of these lads of the stupidly long contracts and sell them for a lot less than you paid for them.

So ok you pay Shaktar 10m a year for 8 years for Mudryk but if you then sell him for 30m after a couple of years because he's not lived up to expectations then they still have to pay Shaktar.
Click to expand...
Didn’t they pay £30m of the fee to Ukraine?
 
CDX_EIRE said:
Its an "impossible" decision, get it over with now or limp for a season and risk losing 10s of millions on the sale.

Unai truly could not have joined us at a better time. This is it, this is the window you could have only dreamed of 5 or 6 years ago.
Click to expand...
I think we have to be prepared to pay big bucks to Emery to keep him at Villa Park, because there are three very high profile jobs are coming up in the UK this season , and some in Europe.
 
tarzansbrother said:
Didn’t they pay £30m of the fee to Ukraine?
Click to expand...

I've no idea. Just using him as an example of how these contracts apparently work.

If course they were banned immediately after Chelsea signed 5663 players on them but no action against Chelsea for having implemented them.
 
wittonite said:
I think we have to be prepared to pay big bucks to Emery to keep him at Villa Park, because there are three very high profile jobs are coming up in the UK this season , and some in Europe.
Click to expand...
Think he's on £6m a year as it is - basically double what Dean Smith was on if what's reported is correct.
 
JW1985 said:
The problem for them is that they are going to have to sell some of these lads of the stupidly long contracts and sell them for a lot less than you paid for them.

So ok you pay Shaktar 10m a year for 8 years for Mudryk but if you then sell him for 30m after a couple of years because he's not lived up to expectations then they still have to pay Shaktar.
Click to expand...
Its the FFP impact thats juicy, Todd can eat a decade of losses but FFP works against them. They've made themselves a midtable side. The only way they can help themselves is to sell players they don't want to sell i.e. the performers.

Plenty of teams would buy Gallagher and Palmer, they wont get what they want for Gallagher because realistically only someone like West Ham would want him. Palmer could come to a team like us but we're not paying 50m for him.

Its so juicy. They have to figure it out with what they have. Saudi is the only thing that could help them but how many of these young lads want to blow up their career any further?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.