new to me that they play on the same day this lad played lots of football at Peterbrough
I don't understand this.
new to me that they play on the same day this lad played lots of football at Peterbrough
thing is there one was a free and the other cost a fair bit of out buget this season
I shall get back to you John when I've worked out what you are on aboutnew to me that they play on the same day this lad played lots of football at Peterbrough
i am saying this lad should make the bench before Roberts any day how many times as this club done this keep saying this i have before cook doesnt sign every one hereI shall get back to you John when I've worked out what you are on about
hes not a full back
Critiquing players on a forum is perfectly acceptable, if you don't agree with someones assessment then provide counter evidence to challenge that view. It's no wonder this forum is on its arse, too many snowflakes around dictating to others what they can and can't discuss, it's becoming tiresome.
Defending players who’ve not yet been given the chance to play a minute of football at league level is also perfectly acceptable.
‘Snowflake’ ? What is this, Reddit.com?
correctAgain you've failed to read what was written. No where did I say no one should defend a player whose yet to play for us - I actually said they should do if they felt the need by providing a counter argument.
As I recall, no one is writing off Lopes. What they are questioning is whether spending money on a player who cannot yet contribute to the first team is a wise use of limited money. Something entirely different.
The only way a player improves is playing football , ......
I'd argue it's more down to ability than numbers. He he was good enough he'd be in the matchday squad every week. It's probably odd for him going from playing every week to the very occasional development squad game, I'm not entirely sure how we're developing him in that way as he'd be better off out on loan getting experience and minutes under his belt.