In general in a group of 5 or 6, you need to be able to better the second best team. The rest of the group are made up of also rans.World cup qualification isn't that much of a requirement- Italy didn't manage it
In general in a group of 5 or 6, you need to be able to better the second best team. The rest of the group are made up of also rans.World cup qualification isn't that much of a requirement- Italy didn't manage it
Why?His dogshit.
I would have said this was the game where the team had to put in a good performance or he goes.
Last chance saloon business.
Italy didn't manage it.In general in a group of 5 or 6, you need to be able to better the second best team. The rest of the group are made up of also rans.
Please don’t compare him to Hughton. Chris Hughton has done far more in management! He’s had promotions and been in the game for years, he was just shit for us!
Why?
Last chance saloon from what?
Before these Nations League games, his last acts as manager has been qualifying for the world cup with ease and losing England's second ever final on penalties.
So where has this "got to go" come from? Two defeats to Hungary, and reasonable draws with Italy and Germany?
Are they?Apart from being a nice bloke and having good PR, what does he have to offer?
Nothing.
When has he ever really looked like getting the best of the players available to him?
Never.
One of the greatest pools of players available in history.
Your first sentence was enough because it explains everything. This is also why Ron Greenwood got the job ahead of Brian Clough. Being nice is important for sure but it usually ends up with second place. A no nonsense and thorough professional who is as hard as nails and not afraid of making unpopular decisions is what’s required to be a winner combined with the actual coaching skills of course. Looking back over the years I can’t think of any England manager who matches this criteria. Perhaps Venables? But that’s about it.Apart from being a nice bloke and having good PR, what does he have to offer?
Nothing.
When has he ever really looked like getting the best of the players available to him?
Never.
One of the greatest pools of players available in history.
Your first sentence was enough because it explains everything. This is also why Ron Greenwood got the job ahead of Brian Clough. Being nice is important for sure but it usually ends up with second place. A no nonsense and thorough professional who is as hard as nails and not afraid of making unpopular decisions is what’s required to be a winner combined with the actual coaching skills of course. Looking back over the years I can’t think of any England manager who matches this criteria. Perhaps Venables? But that’s about it.
If I’m being totally honest I can’t rememberCapello fit that criteria didn't he?
Yes, would make sense chap.With his name I would expect him to wear a waistcoat at matches too chap.
Why does he have to go?
Is that a disrespect to Hungary thing? Are there any other countries that are so crap that a home defeat automatically triggers the sacking of the most successful English manager of most of our lifetimes?
Declan Rice is our best midfielderHe has to go because despite having a huge amount of depth in talent, he still manages to fuck it up. Dreadful appointment, dreadful manager.
Are they?
Why are they?
Whom are the superstars?
Who are the players that Bayern, Real, Barcelona, PSG are spending £100m+ because they are desperate to buy?
Not all of them even play for champions League teams; quite a few don't. One of the squad today is a championship player and Kalvon Phillips very nearly was.
You have Kane, who is one of the better England strikers ever.
Then what?
I don't see any individual player better than Beckham was, or Lampard or Gerrard. I don't see any defender better than Sol Campbell was- certainly not John fucking Stones.
What is so special about this team that people think it should have won something? I rather think this lot getting to a final is a fucking miracle
When it comes to tournaments, how often do you see teams winning them by playing all-out attack football and scoring a ton of goals?
Look at the last few winners and you'll see they've tended to grind out wins and scrape through the knockout rounds.
The idea that Southgate should have approached things any differently in the last two tournaments is nonsense.