Not sure it is discrimination if the stats clearly show x% more die over a certain age. We drift towards the off topic thread if we go too far in this, but relating to going to games, again, is it discrimination if under 1% of under 30's die and say 20% of over 70's and so on? (Just an illustration, don't have the latest figures)
Be far more sensible, albeit this is a nightmare (!), that games were made available to watch on tv and yes, unfortunately - much like when you go to a game - it does mean you'd have to pay. Not really any such thing as a free lunch in life is there?!