Fascist Crap | Page 2 | Vital Football

Fascist Crap

Bradford's brilliant.

Surely as the country becomes more diverse, an attempt to say what we have in common and how we feel about it is just what is needed, and to introduce our children to this is appropriate. These are pretty basic practices of any society which most of the rest of the world takes for granted and are not embarrassed about. I think much of reaction against this is rooted in a deep-seated, but misplaced and outdated, confidence that no matter how much we laugh at or mock the idea of our country, that it, and all it makes possible, will always be here. I'm not so sure of that. All our favorite bugaboos -neo-liberal capitalism, the EU, socialism, clever comedians, the universities, -you name it, they've all been chipping away at it. I've played my part in that. Now, I can't help feel we're talking our way into wrecking something which by most reasonable standards is pretty good. Our MB, right here, is emblematic in this regard. It's not what we talk about. It's how we talk about it which leaves a heavy feeling.

I'll shut up and get back to my toast and marmalade in the living hell on this side of the pond.
 
Saying your nation is great or strong, and that you are proud of it, is not the same as saying it is the greatest or strongest.

Some composer came up with a tune called "Deutschland uber alles" in the past. Not sure what country that referred to and what the sentiment was there.
 
Saying your nation is great or strong, and that you are proud of it, is not the same as saying it is the greatest or strongest.

Some composer came up with a tune called "Deutschland uber alles" in the past. Not sure what country that referred to and what the sentiment was there.

Precisely -strength can mean panzer divisions, but it can also mean moral strength and courage, over all can mean world domination, but it can also mean putting your country above other things.
 
Precisely -strength can mean panzer divisions, but it can also mean moral strength and courage, over all can mean world domination, but it can also mean putting your country above other things.
Yeah, but as Buddha has said, he knows people who actually hate the country that they live in, which begs the question, why do they choose to live here?
Some of the comments on various subjects in the Guardian tells me that there are quite a few who despise our country and everything about it.
What a strange thing, to choose to live in a country that you hate?
There was a comment today saying why don’t all the Brexiteers fuck off abroad so they can get their country back and stay part of the Eu.
Twisted logic?
Maybe he’s been asleep?
 
You would do well to look up the paradox of tolerance

No, I am aware of it and it is something that I have remarked on before. Should I be tolerant of the intolerant? I don't think so, but I become "intolerant"myself because of this.

The song - why is it fascist?
 
No, I am aware of it and it is something that I have remarked on before. Should I be tolerant of the intolerant? I don't think so, but I become "intolerant"myself because of this.

The song - why is it fascist?

The paradox essentially means that the only thing you can be justly intolerant of is intolerance.

For example, a racist might say- "muslims should be deported because they want to destroy western society"

Someone would rightly say - "you can't say that, that's racist"

Then vg would say - "look at you telling me what I can and can't say, you fascist".

For the song - I don't think it's fascist per se, but It's definitely nationalistic, it has the lines "Strong Britain, great nation" in it ffs.

If the government made it mandatory for the kids to sing it however, then that would definitely be fascist.
 
The paradox essentially means that the only thing you can be justly intolerant of is intolerance.

For example, a racist might say- "muslims should be deported because they want to destroy western society"

Or alternatively there was a very intolerant religion - intolerant against women, against homosexuals, against other religions or non-believers for example. Should you be tolerant of their intolerant views (and become racist if they have different skin colour), or should you tolerate them, and therefore lead to a rise in intolerance?

Yes, a paradox indeed!
 
Or alternatively there was a very intolerant religion - intolerant against women, against homosexuals, against other religions or non-believers for example. Should you be tolerant of their intolerant views (and become racist if they have different skin colour), or should you tolerate them, and therefore lead to a rise in intolerance?

Yes, a paradox indeed!

Nope you shouldn't be tolerant of it, which is why I'm a not really a big fan of religion in general, as you could be describing pretty much every religion in existence that isn't buddhism there.
 
For the song - I don't think it's fascist per se, but It's definitely nationalistic, it has the lines "Strong Britain, great nation" in it ffs.

There`s nothing wrong with having pride in one`s nation. The strength of the song and the singers is that it`s illustrates that national pride is a colourless non-ethnicity based notion. What we have in common is that we all live here (or have lived here) and are proud to be a collective. If that`s nationalist then I don`t mind, especially if it encourages togetherness, solidifies us as a nation and helps to dilute division.

I welcome the intention behind the song. As a nation unified by a common citizenship we can be strong country and as such, be a useful and helpful neighbour to other nations. If that`s nationalistic, bring it on.
 
Nope you shouldn't be tolerant of it, which is why I'm a not really a big fan of religion in general, as you could be describing pretty much every religion in existence that isn't buddhism there.

Yes, I agree, pretty much every religion to some extent. Some more than others obviously