Spot on,all lying bastards,always jam tomorrow never jam today,I think is the terminologythey are all lying *******. Corbyn, Johnson, may, swinson. The whole lot. All depends on whose lies u want to believe.
Spot on,all lying bastards,always jam tomorrow never jam today,I think is the terminologythey are all lying *******. Corbyn, Johnson, may, swinson. The whole lot. All depends on whose lies u want to believe.
Spot on,all lying bastards,always jam tomorrow never jam today,I think is the terminology
Trouble is that the electorate always votes for the one who tells the biggest lies.
Over promising, under delivering is the best strategy.
Worked for Leave campaign. They fooled the electorate that a lucrative deal would be the easiest deal. The voters fell for it.
Worked for Boris in the Tory leadership. Promised to leave at the end of October even though virtually all of the other contenders publicly told him that the parliamentary arithmetic was not there. The voters fell for it.
My advice for Lib Dems, Labour, Greens, SNP. Promise to lower taxes to zero, double spending in NHS, schools and police, promise free rail travel, TV licenses, no stamp duty, abolish VAT...
...then on 13 Dec, gradually roll back from your promises and cover it up with some smears and blame problems on the mess left by the outgoing administration.
For two years and 8 months Theresa May was dickering about with the Tory Party with her agreement, which non-one accepted but on the third vote had ERG and DUP MPs voted for it May's deal would have gone through. Then we had Boris dickering around for another three months then expected Parliament to pass perhaps the most important Bill ever in the UK in three days. As far as I can see, only Leavers have frustrated the will of the people.For over three years , every attempt possible has been used to frustrate the will of those people.
You may have hit the nail on the head; you can't expect a decision made by a wafer thin majority to be passed by ignoring a major stakeholder in the UK's future.Whatever happens , whether the stalemate continues or inevitably one side 'wins' , the other side will be very disappointed.
He blocked me too, and delights in telling everyone repeatedly. He is a hate filled bigot, I'm just glad he never taught my kids.He has shown that he isnt.
His recent posts have been rants , and he is coming across as a rather angry/nasty man.
Imagine his teachings to a generation of children.
ps. He's blocked me so can't see my posts ?
As VG said, plenty of form to show that he isntSort it out 58, you're better than that.
He has shown that he isnt.
His recent posts have been rants , and he is coming across as a rather angry/nasty man.
Imagine his teachings to a generation of children.
ps. He's blocked me so can't see my posts ?
May was a remainer, she campaigned for remain before becoming PM.For two years and 8 months Theresa May was dickering about with the Tory Party with her agreement, which non-one accepted but on the third vote had ERG and DUP MPs voted for it May's deal would have gone through. Then we had Boris dickering around for another three months then expected Parliament to pass perhaps the most important Bill ever in the UK in three days. As far as I can see, only Leavers have frustrated the will of the people.
What does that have to do with the price of eggs? Her stumbling block was NI. Leaver Boris has adopted 95% of May's deal and put in an alternative and also unworkable NI solution. So, based on Boris' tack not sure what May's initial preference had to do with it. Her problem was putting Party before Nation - something Boris was also guilty of. May being a Remainer just fuels the myth. Boris was always very pro Europe but, as Cameron said, he adopted a Leave profile in order to further his own ambitions [to become PM].May was a remainer, she campaigned for remain before becoming PM.
As VG said, plenty of form to show that he isnt
Well said young man [well you're younger than me]. The time has passed surely for another protest vote that would be the case by ticking the Brexit Party box as it could almost certainly throw Westminster into even more disarray. Ideally, we need to be back to a party with a workable majority [no more knife edge stuff] and an opposition that does its job in holding the Govt. to account.In respect of Farage, I am a fan and admire what he did to drive forward the case for a referendum and his influence in winning it. However, even I am starting to tire of him now. He either wants to complete Brexit utopia, which is never going to happen, and the process of achieving it may risk no Brexit at all. Or he, as some of his haters have said, is just in it for himself and part of him disingenuously or at least subconsciously wants the status quo to continue, so he can continue to make a living as an anti-EU/establishment political and media figure, which suits him quite well financially. There's certainly no pragmatism in his approach.
Re "window licker"-gate... I think this sums up the ethos of the left. As we saw in the commons recently with Phillips, Sherman and the other blob of an MP, whose name I have forgotten: they love to seek and cry victimhood, whine about the abuse they have suffered and had to endure, whilst snarling, shouting and spewing hatred of others left, right and centre!
Nice bit of fat shaming in your righteous post.Re "window licker"-gate... I think this sums up the ethos of the left. As we saw in the commons recently with Phillips, Sherman and the other blob of an MP, whose name I have forgotten: they love to seek and cry victimhood, whine about the abuse they have suffered and had to endure, whilst snarling, shouting and spewing hatred of others left, right and centre!
Nice bit of fat shaming in your righteous post.
On the contrary: it shows the absolute cynicism and hypocrisy of the far right, for ever banging on about PC gone mad and free speech for hate preachers like Yaxley-Lennon, but turning into the most sensitive of snowflakes whenever it happens to suit.
Gills58 unwittingly used a poor expression in his post, was called out on it, and was big enough to apologise. But that was still not enough to stop a massive pile-on, with a dash of homophobia thrown in for good measure.
It seems free speech is fine if you're clever enough to simply imply wholesale slurs about certain races, religions or political persuasions, but woe betide anyone who speaks up directly against it. Then the pearl-clutching starts and it becomes clear that it's not at all about free speech, but about closing down anyone else's right to dissent.
Gills58 unwittingly used a poor expression in his post, was called out on it, and was big enough to apologise. But that was still not enough to stop a massive pile-on, with a dash of homophobia thrown in for good measure.
.