Yes, but I’m desperate to try and spin it. Just don’t know how much they’d look at it.
Don't be sad!
You've been had by the media and the establishment.
Remember May saying that they wouldn't allow him to become PM.
It was said with so much conviction.
If they wasn't so scared of Corbyn winning why would they throw everything at him? They spent so much money to stop him. Even setting up social media bot farms.
Astonished he had the wherewithal. Perhaps it wasn't a leak, maybe he just left the papers behind in the cubicle after shitting out his brains?Hancock was the source of the leak allegedly, I’m shocked I expected it to be Gove.
Astonished he had the wherewithal. Perhaps it wasn't a leak, maybe he just left the papers behind in the cubicle after shitting out his brains?
Yes. Because clearly that is the most important consideration for politicians in the midst of our biggest post war crisis.I think he doesn’t want to get blamed for everything.
Yes. Because clearly that is the most important consideration for politicians in the midst of our biggest post war crisis.
Does this cabinet not realise that this is it for them? Their entire careers are contained within this pandemic. None of them will be worth shit after this; none are going on to glittering cabinet careers afterwards.
The post pandemic government will be almost entirely made up of different people. Sunak alone might be tolerated, but the rest of this lot will be burned out and the tolerance of the public towards them will be even more burned out
I find the perception of Sunak an odd one at times. He hasn't been particularly bold economically, perhaps in contrast to austerity years it seems so.
Also surely offering the North 67% and the South 80% will upset those seats the Tories took from Labour.
North aren't listening or taking note. The numbers that matter are sick of politics. Don't for one second imagine the voters that switched to Tory are remotely on top of that kind of detail.I find the perception of Sunak an odd one at times. He hasn't been particularly bold economically, perhaps in contrast to austerity years it seems so.
Also surely offering the North 67% and the South 80% will upset those seats the Tories took from Labour.
Don't bet on it. These people pay zero attention to politics and mostly vote how they have always done. Johnson got them to switch by promising "no more talk about politics". That is basically the message that got through.Those seats were never going to be kept though, Labour could have any other leader & they’d win most back.
Independent? Chair was a member of a Conservative think tank, his firm work for the government, another commissioner failed to declare a donation to the Conservatives...
There's one obvious point. The EHRC report criticises Corbyn for interfering with the GLU, but the internal Labour Party report says he was asking them why they weren't pursuing complaints. Not trying to slow things down, but to speed them up.
It also gives damning figures - nothing done while McNicol was general secretary and Matthews was in the GLU (allegedly doing nothing while claiming to be doing his job). Far more cases dealt with as soon as Formby took over.
But they then told Panorama it was all Corbyn's fault, and Matthews claimed he'd considered suicide after being moved out of the GLU. Ah, diddums!
Starmer has this report. Its allegations may be false, or only partially true. But it might be worth checking out, because if it's true it exposes the EHRC report as a sham.
That's not what happens in trap 2.Astonished he had the wherewithal. Perhaps it wasn't a leak, maybe he just left the papers behind in the cubicle after shitting out his brains?
My god. You really are just a stereotype.That Panorama programme was low end right wing propaganda that was made to appeal to people like Basher, Pope and CP who are just drones for the establishment and cannot see how much their minds have been controlled
My god. You really are just a stereotype.
That is such an offensive thing to bring up during an argument, regardless of the answer.Pope serious question
Genuine one
Are you on the spectrum?
My partner has worked with children who are on the spectrum and reads Vital every now and again, just for shits and giggles, and she reckons that you definitely show repetitive behaviours and also other signs that are very telling to her
Do you believe that that is a good and valid line of attack in a debate?Pope serious question
Genuine one
Are you on the spectrum?
My partner has worked with children who are on the spectrum and reads Vital every now and again, just for shits and giggles, and she reckons that you definitely show repetitive behaviours and also other signs that are very telling to her
Do you believe that that is a good and valid line of attack in a debate?