And the second goal was even better.That pass for the first goal!!! Sublime....
And by the time he goes down, Jackson is back to cover. Worth appealing that?Looks like their player charged Rushworth into the penalty area?!
That wasn’t a penalty or a sending off, in fact a free kick to usLooks like their player charged Rushworth into the penalty area?!
Unfortunately I think there’s enough in the Rushworth red for it not to be overturned. Personally only think it’s a yellow or even just a pen but reviewers won’t agree.
I thought Boyes put in some really good crosses actuallyWhat a terrific little passing sequence our second goal was after Sorensen nicked the ball.
And that cross for the third goal is something I hope Boyes and Roughan learn from. Superb!
And by the time he goes down, Jackson is back to cover. Worth appealing that?
Having watched the replay several times I am firmly of the opinion that the referee was 100% wrong. The Vale player simply barged into Rushworth who was trying to shield the ball with Jackson behind him. There should have been no penalty or red card, a free kick to Lincoln and a warning for the Port Vale player. That said we should never have passed back to Rushworth from that position, and Rushworth cocked up mightily and gave a trigger happy erratic referee the opportunity to make a big decision.If you watch the replay slowed down frame by frame the initial contact is outside the area then both players fall over in the box. I understand the referee didn’t have VAR but we should have a very decent chance of an appeal here. Even with the ball at his feet Jackson would have been able to get a challenge in and was clearly between Taylor and the goal.