D
Departed
Guest
He's an idiot. And he just confirmed it.
Haha Niall, I do have a big back so there is no grief there, everybody has their opinion, but mine is, well you all know what mine is.Hi PY
I usually have your back m8, but not on this occasion.
I was merely outing my own (similar to TQ) reservations on obtaining Kompany.
I know it's all ifs and buts, 'but' we do need a person to comitt, at least on the face of it, to a longer term project 3/5 years.
We all know if Pep decided he'd run his race next Summer, and Kompany was offered the job he'd Jump at it.
And that's not to say others wouldn't either + it's obvious his lack of prem experience which indeed was clearly evident in the Burney Man C game, he was clearly out classed tactically.
I just think among others it's a risk not worth taking, but I do see your points for his appointment.
Haha Niall, slowly weakening!Hi PY
I suppose there could be an argument, for Burnley losing at that time, given their focus would've been on promotion, as it wasn't just as clear cut back then.
Yep, Kompany could commit to us just as equally Poch could run if the RM job came up next Summer.
Believe it or not the only candidate I see not jumping ship quickly would be 'Rodgers' not a popular choice, but think on this
He has done 'Big time' with Liverpool and got burnt, is just left Leicester so we are a bigger club, can manage to a degree of success at Prem level, and appears to bring on players from lower levels and can manage a project.
That's not to say I want him at Spurs.
If we can get Kompany to comitt and he is, with us for 2 years and bring us to a point where we're stronger better than now, I'd be happy...
Ultimately, we're now back into the narrative where our next manager has to solve all of our club problems, rather than just do their job as 1st team coach.
The reasons why Kompany should be considered is that he is a strong, winning personality and is a good coach that plays progressive, front foot football. He can watch a game from the technical area and see what is going on. He can change it in the 90 mins. Also, if you watch him closely he has no problem fronting up to his players and showing them who's boss, just like he did as a captain.
I actually don't give a monkeys whether he has one year or 10 years experience. I don't care that he hasn't managed in the Prem and I don't care that he hasn't won anything. Just like not hiring him because of his association with City. They are the wrong reasons for exclusion.
That would also be my opinion with other managers like Carrick, Slot, de Zerbi, Enrique etc.
THFC will eventually figure out that it is their job to create the conditions for their managers to thrive. Kompany, as an example could absolutely thrive. So could the others. Just like Xavi at Barca, it's the clubs job to narrow down his scope to what is important. He's the 1st team coach. That's all.
I've got a bad feeling in my water that it's going to be Brendan f*****g Rodgers.
It's not what he may bring, it's the man i can't stand.Ahh
SP you've been reading my reasons for signing him.
It scared me when I wrote it up.
I blame PY for being in the Kompany cheer leading camp.
Ss where has any of us, namely me, said they want VC for who he is, a rather incendiary comment if you ask me.
I have voted for VC on the way he coaches Burnley only, no other reason.
All of you keep coming up with no cos of this, cos of that, yall might be right, but me I stick by my guns and want him or even AS for that matter.
Haha RD unfortunately not, its just that I am sticking by my guns in the belief that VC would be good for us, it probably won't happen, but I will be chuffed if it does.Aha Pompey are you getting commission regarding Kompany?
I'm not against it either. Rather him than a win now manager.
Yeeha mutters, finally write your piece, have been waiting for you to join the Cheering camp of VC, cos you did note him a while ago.Ultimately, we're now back into the narrative where our next manager has to solve all of our club problems, rather than just do their job as 1st team coach.
The reasons why Kompany should be considered is that he is a strong, winning personality and is a good coach that plays progressive, front foot football. He can watch a game from the technical area and see what is going on. He can change it in the 90 mins. Also, if you watch him closely he has no problem fronting up to his players and showing them who's boss, just like he did as a captain.
I actually don't give a monkeys whether he has one year or 10 years experience. I don't care that he hasn't managed in the Prem and I don't care that he hasn't won anything. Just like not hiring him because of his association with City. They are the wrong reasons for exclusion.
That would also be my opinion with other managers like Carrick, Slot, de Zerbi, Enrique etc.
THFC will eventually figure out that it is their job to create the conditions for their managers to thrive. Kompany, as an example could absolutely thrive. So could the others. Just like Xavi at Barca, it's the clubs job to narrow down his scope to what is important. He's the 1st team coach. That's all.
If it appens I am going to blame you aaarrrrggghhh!I've got a bad feeling in my water that it's going to be Brendan f*****g Rodgers.
I can take the blame Niall, always have, that's life, broad shoulders help lol!Ahh
SP you've been reading my reasons for signing him.
It scared me when I wrote it up.
I blame PY for being in the Kompany cheer leading camp.
Fair enough Ss but when I said incendiary it was only regards me, I want VC as our new coach for what I have witnessed in his change/attitude/running of Burnley etc.I'm not sure it is incendiary, look on Twitter and it's full of comments such as look what he's achieved as a player, look who he's worked with, look where he played
None are reasons to employ a manager in my mind, if you look at it purely in a managerial job and what he's done it's not overly impressive and certainly no more impressive than others that have taken teams out that league such as Dyche
My previous example of wilder holds as well, he had a much less fancied side, built on a tiny budget and played excellent football, why not he's he not getting linked in the media ? It's because he hasn't played at Man City would be my guess
He spent 20 million more than the closest other team
https://the72.co.uk/2023/02/08/how-much-money-has-each-championship-side-spent-this-season/amp/
Which doesn't include loans
That's on top of a core which almost stayed up in the PL, money spent doesn't equate to winning, but it does help.