collingham imps
Vital Squad Member
Apparently the Chairman had decided to dispense with their services during the lock-down
Can't find the tweet now, but that was on there.Apparently the Chairman had decided to dispense with their services during the lock-down
Not crazy at all.Call me nuts, call me crazy but I think Norwich may be an option for them.
The hints dropped on Radio Leeds last night suggested that the Chairman thought they should be getting a bit more of a tune out of the foreign talent there, which seems to stem from the fact they can't get shut of them due to high wages so should at least keep them involved.
Need to sell to buy as well because no investment is going in. A case of someone having to come in and work with what they've got and not wanting to cut their losses on players.
Obviously one of the possible multiple issues around budgets, but we all knew this'd happen anyway. Still baffling that DC/NC, as two intelligent and diligent guys, didn't. Unless they've been completely lied to and shafted. And I don't think DC is the type of person who'll let things go unchallenged if he feels he's been wronged. When those two things collide...
I think Kongolo is a major talking point here. Worth over £10m probably a few months ago, but how much now? His value has decreased hugely this season and I would think the devaluing of some of the club's assets – with Cowley giving Kongolo and chums the cold shoulder – is a sticking point with the chairman.
Not particularly anything to do with Appleton, although I do think he will do well with us. More that the brothers had decided they had outgrown us (probably correctly) and duly acted on it. Nothing has changed since, apart from theyve been sacked, so they have still outgrown us. To be fair, I doubt they'd want to come back anyway, and have their sights set higher up.Good answer Plumbob, Gary Megson is hero at Albion. He cameback as Pulis's 2nd it tarnised his rep. Appleton has stablised you, knows the league and will advance you
More a poor indictment of their previous buying policy, one which they seem to want to return to
Jules, can you re-name this thread Cowley's Sacked, please?
Jules, can you re-name this thread Cowley's Sacked, please?
Surely there were two Cowleys sacked, so 'Cowleys sacked' would be correct.
Jules, can you re-name this thread Cowley's Sacked, please?
Surely there were two Cowleys sacked, so 'Cowleys sacked' would be correct.
Unless you meant that only Danny Cowley had been sacked, in which case 'Cowley's sacked' would be correct because you are saying 'Danny Cowley is sacked.' If so, was his brother not sacked, too?
I really *must* learn to do olive.