SurreyBOB - 16/3/2018 15:58
Oh and by the way as you mocked my post. The Morning Star (last residue of Marxist thinking in this country) failed to mention this poisoning on its front page all week. That is from today's Times. So is my admittedly humorous post about left-wingers having a reluctance to criticise the land of Lenin, Stalin and Trotsky reallly that far from the truth?
SurreyBOB - 16/3/2018 14:58
Oh and by the way as you mocked my post. The Morning Star (last bastion of Marxist thinking in this country) failed to mention this poisoning on its front page all week. That is from today's Times. So is my admittedly humorous post about left-wingers having a visceral reluctance to criticise the land of Lenin, Stalin and Trotsky really that far from the truth?
PhilK66 - 16/3/2018 18:33
Nibbles. In 2003 the english boss of BA decided to switch airports from Sheretemeyvo to Domodedovo.. The first is owned/controlled by the Mafia. Domodedovo isn't. The Russian Mafia put a US$50k price on the BA guy's head unless he changed his mind. The guy took refuge in our embassy.
The ambassador was away but on his return asked why the guy was living there. After the explanation he spoke personally to Putin in his fluent Russian. They had often been drinking together and were on very good terms. Putin said he would fix it.
Later an aide to Putin told our ambassador what happened. The Russian Mafia godfather was summoned to the Kremlin and seated in a very low chair in front of Putin's very large desk and was warned that if anything happened to the BA guy he the boss, no one else, would be two metres in the ground. Needless to say the Mafia called it off and BA changed airports. This was told to me by an attache at the Moscow Embassy.
SteveTreacle - 16/3/2018 23:34
No, I haven?t. I?ve just got a different opinion to you and a much less pompous one.
To clarify the point re Corbyn (and to rebut your defence of your hero), maybe Corbyn is seemingly being cautious in wanting conclusive evidence, but nobody doubts that the attack came from Russia. If it did come from a source other than the state, Putin was given ample opportunity to come back with a line along the lines of ?we?re sorry that this attack has come from Russia. It wasn?t state sanctioned. W?ell done everything we can to track them down and bring them to justice?. Instead, he went on the offensive and blamed the U.K. for everything and decide to take the piss.
The government has rightly reacted strongly to this. The custom in these situations is for parliament to show a united front (many on the Labour and other benches have), yet Corbyn has chosen to try to make political ground from it and has reverted to his usual instinct of when defence and national security is in question ?backed the other side? (which seems to be the wont of the left).
It?s laughable that you lot think it is some sort of conspiracy by the government or bbc to start some sort of chest beating campaign against Russia, when the only guilty parties are Russia and Corbyn?s attempts to not properly stand up to them in an attempt to make politcal ground.
SteveTreacle - 16/3/2018 23:34
No, I haven?t. I?ve just got a different opinion to you and a much less pompous one.
To clarify the point re Corbyn (and to rebut your defence of your hero), maybe Corbyn is seemingly being cautious in wanting conclusive evidence, but nobody doubts that the attack came from Russia. If it did come from a source other than the state, Putin was given ample opportunity to come back with a line along the lines of ?we?re sorry that this attack has come from Russia. It wasn?t state sanctioned. W?ell done everything we can to track them down and bring them to justice?. Instead, he went on the offensive and blamed the U.K. for everything and decide to take the piss.
The government has rightly reacted strongly to this. The custom in these situations is for parliament to show a united front (many on the Labour and other benches have), yet Corbyn has chosen to try to make political ground from it and has reverted to his usual instinct of when defence and national security is in question ?backed the other side? (which seems to be the wont of the left).
It?s laughable that you lot think it is some sort of conspiracy by the government or bbc to start some sort of chest beating campaign against Russia, when the only guilty parties are Russia and Corbyn?s attempts to not properly stand up to them in an attempt to make politcal ground.