Have to echo what SD said a few posts up. Hugely surprised leaving the game at the reaction. Not read back again but first impressions were seemingly people are thinking already that we should roll over teams at will. We played exactly how we did away at Spuds and Saints up until the penalty and while not as effective after it went 1-1 we were still dangerous. I clearly saw a different game and I don’t agree that we ‘we lucky’ as has been posted. We were the ones showing more quality in the attacks . Spam were relying on a long switch over the top to our fullbacks and nothing else. The reaction post game is classic small picture thinking, game by game instead of seeing it in the wider context of life under Unai so far and where we are going. It really wasn’t that bad from the stands imho.,
Also hugely surprised that even though it’s still early days people are still questioning the style . Seriously peeps this is it under Unai. I really wouldn’t bother wasting time on posting about the playing from the back. That particular part of the playing style has nothing all to do with not having the required level of player. We may create more with better players we may keep the ball better in higher areas of the pitch with better players but the slow style sucking the press in to exploit the gaps left behind is here to stay . FACT.
It really could be sabbatical time for the next 2-3 years for some if they are going to get frustrated with the playing style.
For the first time in a long time . And I mean a long time, we look like we have a plan , a style and are clear in what we want to achieve. The players know even if it doesn’t work out all the time . And they believe in it. It really is night and day compared to how they looked under Stevie G.