So city offered Halsey a bribe that if they were losing he was to add on an extra minute possibly two than you’d expect - City would then simply score a couple of goals in this time.
What a cunning plan.
OK Nibbles, This has all been discussed many times before and unless someone gives a death-bed confession I doubt if we will ever know the truth. It is however worth listing all of the arguments just one more time: -
1. Halsey stated that the length of the Gillingham celebrations were a major contributing factor to the extra time. In fact the celebrations were not that long, Sky even missed the restart because they were re-showing the goals.
2. Although there was a handball incident earlier in the game which could (and probably should) have seen a penalty awarded to City it was not easy to see as the slide by a City player right in front of Halsey which took the ball out of play for a Gills corner with the ball actually being held under his arm by that player. (Think it was actually during the extra time period but not sure).
3. Sky always used to show the "stats" including the amount of time the ball was actually in play at the end of each half. The stats were not shown at the end of the second half. I wonder why?
4. Very shortly after the match Sky were reported as taking up 10% of City's shares.
5. Mark Halsey was reportedly seen after the game celebrating the result with a load of City Fans.
6. The match was reportedly shown on screen to a group of referees at a referees training session and they were asked to state how much injury time they would each allow. Not one trainee would have added the amount of time Mark Halsey saw fit to add.
7. I thought that we enjoyed the rub of the green as far as the refereeing of the Wigan game was concerned. As ridiculous as it seems I wonder if the referee was under instruction to correct an injustice if possible.
Do I think that Mark Halsey took a financial bribe to see City home, no I don't, but there are enough unanswered questions to leave a nasty taste in the mouth. Personally I will never believe that we were fairly treated and will always wonder what would have happened if we had been promoted then. For example would Tony Pullis have stayed if we had gone up? Probably not but who knows. Alternatively we might have come straight back down again and missed out on the best five years out of supporting the Gills.