Barnsleyspur
Vital Squad Member
Was gutted we didn't go in for him in the summer.From what I've just been told, we also asked about Alex Scott, and from my accounts pretty much told to do one! lol!
Was gutted we didn't go in for him in the summer.From what I've just been told, we also asked about Alex Scott, and from my accounts pretty much told to do one! lol!
Supposedly we are now talking to Lloyd Kelly's agent.
Well he is a commited player as far as I can see...aggressive bordering on dirty!Chelsea don't want Gallagher to move until the summer, and even then might offer a big/ long enough new deal, if he'll stay and fight for a starting place - the key issue for Chelsea could still be Sustainability rules.
Chelsea still have a few players they could move on, but a sale of Gallagher could offset all those risks of penalties.
His preferred destination, if he stays in the PL, is Spurs.
All that is accordingly to someone I know who works closely with his agents.
I'm not overly concerned because we tend to buy better when we don't overspend. Bale, Vic & Modric instantly spring to mind.Feels like this happens to us every window
I'm not overly concerned because we tend to buy better when we don't overspend. Bale, VdV & Modric instantly spring to mind.
lol... not too well.Yeah we even had a window where we didn't spend at all out of fear of overspending.
How well did that go?
lol... not too well.
Ironically we do tend to fare a lot better with signings when we don't push the boat out. Look at all of our big buys, not one has really set the world on fire.
VdV, Bale, Hugo, Harry, Vic, & Son are amongst some of the very best signings we've made in the last few years & not one of their transfer fees was what you would call earth shattering, certainly not when compared to the likes of Tanguy, Loco or Rich who have generally fared quite poorly.
We've spent big money already or that's what i've been led to believe.Ofc bargains are bargains. Same goes for kulu and benta.
However bargains are harder to find. Especially for some positions, namely CB and CF.
We've spent big money already or that's what i've been led to believe.
Didn't Porro cost us an arm & a leg? Both Romero & VdV were pricy too.
Dragon or whatever the hell he's called is held in high regard & as such we'll probably have to pay a hefty premium for his services as well. If we don't get him we'll move on, it wouldn't be the end of the world. Keeping Dier however...
Why is it that we're always surrounded by riddles when it comes to transfers?Chelsea don't want Gallagher to move until the summer, and even then might offer a big/ long enough new deal, if he'll stay and fight for a starting place - the key issue for Chelsea could still be Sustainability rules.
Chelsea still have a few players they could move on, but a sale of Gallagher could offset all those risks of penalties.
His preferred destination, if he stays in the PL, is Spurs.
All that is accordingly to someone I know who works closely with his agents.
I'd say Ange-ball is no different to Ten-ball!. Ten has the same problem with his prima donna's, they don't fit the bill! Ajax were pretty fluid and expansive side under him.So with Reguilon returning would Ange be prepared to use him or would he be deemed too brittle to play Ange-ball?
I'd say Ange-ball is no different to Ten-ball!. Ten has the same problem with his prima donna's, they don't fit the bill! Ajax were pretty fluid and expansive side under him.
Reggie was only there to provide cover for injuries.
He is nowhere near good enough. Bargain basement stuff if true.Not so sure about Kelly, he can play both left side CB and LB but he always seems to have a mistake or two in him.
Ange should use him. We need a second option at LB and like it or not Reggie is our best option.So with Reguilon returning would Ange be prepared to use him or would he be deemed too brittle to play Ange-ball?