jal jal - 6/1/2018 14:27
We can do much better than Theo Robinson he only turned up when the TV cameras were filming the games, otherwise he only scored 1 goal in 14 league games., and that is a poor return.
MaineRoad_96 - 6/1/2018 14:58
jal jal - 6/1/2018 14:27
We can do much better than Theo Robinson he only turned up when the TV cameras were filming the games, otherwise he only scored 1 goal in 14 league games., and that is a poor return.
I thought we played some of our best football with him in the team. I think he would be a great addition.
Scotimp - 7/1/2018 07:18
jal jal - 6/1/2018 14:27
We can do much better than Theo Robinson he only turned up when the TV cameras were filming the games, otherwise he only scored 1 goal in 14 league games., and that is a poor return.
He got 2 in 14 league games - he scored the first at Chester (which was originally allocated incorrectly to Matt Rhead) and at home against Maidstone.
His overall scoring record was very good, with 9 in 22 games (18 starts).
The camera-only thing was suggested at the time. The fact that he performed very well against the better sides but couldn't do the same in the National League is interesting.
Luke Imp - 6/1/2018 17:49
We were a better side with Robinson in it (took him a handful of games to get his eye in). Linked the play well and he probably held the ball up better than Green currently does and I think he'd be a decent enough sub to bring on for Green if needed.
He missed some sitters, though, didn't he? 3 or 4 one-on-ones IIRC and on in particular at the BM end that he skied.
The Electric Banana - 6/1/2018 15:19
I went to FA Cup reply against Guisley with a work colleague who is a FA qualified youth coach and he was mightly impressed with Robinson and the way he linked the team together.
Its a mute point, as he will not be returning to Sincil Bank.
GoBC - 6/1/2018 18:42
(I'll not mention that it's a 'moot' rather than 'mute' point, in case anyone confuses me with Impalex)
Bazzzer - 6/1/2018 20:07
GoBC - 6/1/2018 18:42
(I'll not mention that it's a 'moot' rather than 'mute' point, in case anyone confuses me with Impalex)
I'm waiting with baited breath for that to happen.
Barney Imp - 6/1/2018 20:15
Bazzzer - 6/1/2018 20:07
GoBC - 6/1/2018 18:42
(I'll not mention that it's a 'moot' rather than 'mute' point, in case anyone confuses me with Impalex)
I'm waiting with baited breath for that to happen.
Or is that bated....?
Bazzzer - 6/1/2018 21:22
Barney Imp - 6/1/2018 20:15
Bazzzer - 6/1/2018 20:07
GoBC - 6/1/2018 18:42
(I'll not mention that it's a 'moot' rather than 'mute' point, in case anyone confuses me with Impalex)
I'm waiting with baited breath for that to happen.
Or is that bated....?
Someone took the bait.
Barney Imp - 6/1/2018 22:48
Bazzzer - 6/1/2018 21:22
Barney Imp - 6/1/2018 20:15
Bazzzer - 6/1/2018 20:07
GoBC - 6/1/2018 18:42
(I'll not mention that it's a 'moot' rather than 'mute' point, in case anyone confuses me with Impalex)
I'm waiting with baited breath for that to happen.
A decent outfit, but not in the same league as Smashem, Grabbit and Runn.
Or is that bated....?
Someone took the bait.
Hooke, Lynx and Sincker....
NottyImp - 7/1/2018 09:47
Barney Imp - 6/1/2018 22:48
Bazzzer - 6/1/2018 21:22
Barney Imp - 6/1/2018 20:15
Bazzzer - 6/1/2018 20:07
GoBC - 6/1/2018 18:42
(I'll not mention that it's a 'moot' rather than 'mute' point, in case anyone confuses me with Impalex)
I'm waiting with baited breath for that to happen.
A decent outfit, but not in the same league as Smashem, Grabbit and Runn.
Or is that bated....?
Someone took the bait.
Hooke, Lynx and Sincker....