My thoughts are 50/50 and it really depends on whago.t direction we need to go.
1. If we can manage to keep most of the loanees - lets say , Snodgrass, Grabban, Tuanzebe, Terry (not strictly a loan), Hutton (ditto) etc... , in fact, I would say the majority of this squad, minus Johnstone, Grealish, Onomah, Chester - who I think will definately go, I would say keep Bruce.
My reasoning is, lets face it, our season ended before it began, those frst 10 games cost us any chance of automatic, and, if all those players stayed, I would not expect the same again in August, so think we would be strong challengers for Automatic - and upheavel would be harmful.
2. If all those players go - which lets face it, is highly likely, then a totally new direction, philosophy and playing style is needed - and Bruce is not the man. In my eyes, he has done the job he was brought into do - to sort out the mess. He has done it , and for that, he has my gratitude, but if a new squad is needed, it is time to say Thanks and goodbye, and get someone with a fresh approach.
Personally, I want to go leftfield. The obvious names sticking out is Allerdyce, and Moyes and I really like both, but that is just making the same mistake again in my eyes - time to go different.
If we can find a Silva, or a Jokanovic somewhere, then do that, but if we can't, go the way of Southampton, Wigan, Bournemouth etc...
Promote Mark Delaney, bring in a No.2 (names of Petrov, Mellberg, Laursen etc... come to mind) and bring through the youth - it worked for the FA (so far) or, for example, the Shrewsbury / Lincoln type manager - gamble ? -yes - but we have had the most experienced managers possible over the last 10 years - Hoillier, Lambert , Bruce - and that hasn't worked.
Ironically - what we really could do with at this moment, is a Tim Sherwood type manager (for clarity - not Tim Sherwood himself - but that type !)