No place for this type comment on the forum. If there was a statue of you I would tearing it down as we speak.
Disgusting, have a bit of respect MD....’Wicked Messenger’s Matter’.....!!
No place for this type comment on the forum. If there was a statue of you I would tearing it down as we speak.
Anyway having said all that I do agree that I don't think Smith is the man to take us forward. He did brilliantly to get us up and will have done well to keep us up but perhaps it should be time to say thank you and goodbye. Part ways without it turning sour.
If we stay up it’s ruthless . But the club is bigger than one person.
He plays attractive football and got us promoted. He took us to a league cup final (I don't care how easy the Liverpool game was, irrelevant). I dont understand why, given the right players, people dont think he could take us to a league cup win or an FA cup win or a top seven finish next season? Maybe even further than that in two seasons time with continued investment in the squad and facilities?
That's due to a lack of playing quality though. When we had players of an equal or superior standing to the opposition, such as last season in the championship or this season against Norwich or in the league cup, we have been absolutely fantastic to watch and getting results we should be getting.Attractive football park the bus and long ball to Davis if that dont work .
Attractive football park the bus and long ball to Davis if that dont work .
I think the club will have already made up their mind if he's going or not. The transfer window opens Monday. Then we've what, 7 weeks till the season begins. We need to either say goodbye then get a new man in quickly or say Smith is staying and we're backing him.
And if we'd kept Bruce we would have been in a worse position with JoeBLANKlinton leading the line and £40m down the SwannyWhen comparing Bruce and Smith for me there's not much in it Smith took us one game further than Bruce but you could argue that Smith inherited a better squad than Bruce did.
And if we'd kept Bruce we would have been in a worse position with JoeBLANKlinton leading the line and £40m down the Swanny
Yes , but some on here are even refusing to give him credit for getting promotion , spouting rubbish like it was a two man team and we were lucky Jack came back from injury.
Just don't get this we were only good because player x, y or z was having a stormer.
Isn't that what happens in any successful team ever ?. Odd stick to beat a manager with in my humble.
And if we'd kept Bruce we would have been in a worse position with JoeBLANKlinton leading the line and £40m down the Swanny
Yes they are not giving him undeserved credit unlike many who refuse to see the truth behind why we actually got promoted because if he was really responsible for that promotion, we would have seen the team and the players improve. Heard about this bloke called Chris Wilder? Now that is what a manager looks like who deserves every word of praise coming his way.
Sorry mate, you fall right there.
That would be Chris Wilder who has had time to instil a team ethic and philosophy for 3 odd years under far less pressure?
That would be a Chris Wilder who hasn't had to deal with half the squad going out of contract just as they hit the big time?
That would be a Chris Wilder who spend big as well, but could pick and choose which signing for depth came into the squad, as opposed to (as above) half the squad needed revamping.
I'm a Wilder fan...but DS, even with my stated 'ethos and improvement' questions, still has that defence.
Wilder and Sheff U comparisons are akin to asking why your 11 year old during a school play wasn't quite as good as Laurence Olivier or Tom Hanks.