Redchops
Vital Squad Member
why do you put each sentence in a new paragraphWhy do you say?
If they do?
When there's zero chance?
well
thought so
why do you put each sentence in a new paragraphWhy do you say?
If they do?
When there's zero chance?
Because it’s us vs luton.why do you put each sentence in a new paragraph
well
thought so
I shouldn’t, but I didBecause it’s us vs luton.
I mean if you look at the odds it’s likely to be us vs Luton.
And whatever Everton do.
Or not do.
Maybe.
Its
Us
Vs
Luton.
Robert made many good points on an earlier Garribaldi Red podcast. I assume he has added to it since as the Everton report has come out. It is good news that the report has been allowed to be forwarded to IC. Robert is a red.The Appeal will commence today.
The Trust have confirmed that a report compiled by Robert Matusiewick, was presented to both The Club and the PL in advance of today's appeal.
Lawyers for the PL have agreed that the report will be forwarded to the IC for consideration.
If you cast your minds back, Robert was the geezer who wrote an appraisal of the ICs findings which highlighted a number of inconsistencies.
His report covers the Aims of PSR, an interpretation of the rules and the inconsistencies in the original judgement.
The trust will make the report available at some point after the hearing
Is he the guy who accused it of being a hatchet job?Robert made many good points on an earlier Garribaldi Red podcast. I assume he has added to it since as the Everton report has come out. It is good news that the report has been allowed to be forwarded to IC. Robert is a red.
I think it was, I remember thinking as I was listening to him, that really we should have him representing us as the points he made were so well argued and well presentedIs he the guy who accused it of being a hatchet job?
I think it was, I remember thinking as I was listening to him, that really we should have him representing us as the points he made were so well argued and well presented
Thanks for posting-really interestingChartered accountant who made it all appear much easier to understand than any of the other so called experts.
https://www.nottinghampost.com/spor...ingham-forest-points-deduction-appeal-9192559
Totally agree.I think it was, I remember thinking as I was listening to him, that really we should have him representing us as the points he made were so well argued and well presented
I don’t see why you can’t submit new evidence - it’s a new hearing after all. Either way though it isn’t actually evidence - it’s a report by an accountant on the evidence and the decision(s).Was that report allowed to be submitted? I thought you could not submit anything new for an appeal?
In Everton's original case they could not submit anything new that wasn't heard at the original hearing Basha.I don’t see why you can’t submit new evidence - it’s a new hearing after all. Either way though it isn’t actually evidence - it’s a report by an accountant on the evidence and the decision(s).
Mao confirmed this aboveWas that report allowed to be submitted? I thought you could not submit anything new for an appeal?
I don’t see why you can’t submit new evidence - it’s a new hearing after all. Either way though it isn’t actually evidence - it’s a report by an accountant on the evidence and the decision(s).
That really would be hilarious…I was thinking that it would be very funny if the IC made comment to impartiality and bias due to Robert being a forest supporter and on the NFFC Trust.
I mean if they did that would be questioning the integrity of a qualified accountant wouldn't it.
That in itself is grounds for challenging the legality of any decisions made.In Everton's original case they could not submit anything new that wasn't heard at the original hearing Basha.
I'm really happy if we have been allowed to use that report, it certainly makes very valid points.
I still not sure they will be interested to consider it though when making a decision to tell us you're staying at - 4
They are far smarter than that-more likely they will find someone to rebut his pointsI was thinking that it would be very funny if the IC made comment to impartiality and bias due to Robert being a forest supporter and on the NFFC Trust.
I mean if they did that would be questioning the integrity of a qualified accountant wouldn't it.
New facts are not allowed. It is an appeal not a retrial. No new facts in Roberts report just same facts with a different view and put succinctly and coherently. I imagine we will get. 5. Points returned.I don’t see why you can’t submit new evidence - it’s a new hearing after all. Either way though it isn’t actually evidence - it’s a report by an accountant on the evidence and the decision(s).