SirRodneyEffing
Vital Squad Member
Didn't the McCabes trigger the events with the £5m offer?
That’s as I understood it
Unless I misunderstood, the offer from the McCabes then opened the door for the counter-offer. (I don't have the contract in front of me...) IMO £5m was a low-ball, and was never going to get HRH to go away.
This is the turn of events as I understand it:
1) McCabe wants to end the partnership. Part of the agreement stipulates that if one of the partners makes an offer for the other's shares then the other partner has to either accept or make a counter offer of the same amount, which then must be accepted by the instigator. McCabe offers £5M (about half of the value of the shares at the time.)
2) A second agreement says that if the Prince owns 75% of the club or more, he must then purchase Bramall Lane and the other properties at current market value (estimated to be somewhere between £20-40M.) As a result, McCabe will either sell all of his interests in us to the Prince for a sizable total sum, or he will regain full control for a small sum. Either way, the partnership will be done and McCabe won't have to deal with the Prince and his people anymore. Based on the court case so far, I expect that McCabe thought (correctly) that the Prince wouldn't be able to afford to buy him out completely, so he would get the club back on the cheap.
3) The Prince creates a new company and transfers most of his shares to it, then counters McCabe's original offer but claims that he doesn't have to buy the properties as neither company owns 75%+ of the club. McCabe thinks this is dodgy (plus inline with some of the other things he thinks that the Prince has done, such as the "bribe"/loan) and launches the lawsuit.
4) Lawyers on both sides profit. Fans not so much...
I could be wrong though...