king_dezeeuw06
Vital Champions League
Unfortunately Ms Nandy has no business expertise at all, her degree is in Politics not Economics or Business Studies. I would suggest that any comment from her as to the viability of any business plans from the bidders needs to be treated with a degree of scepticism. She also has no family links to business or experience herself as straight out of university she went into a political environment and has never worked in a commercial management position.
You are assuming the deal is good and she is misunderstanding it and coming to the wrong conclusion. Could we not as easily assume she is judging it correctly because it's not good for us?
She has said they are all working closely together probably, I suspect the council, SC, Nandy are all briefing each other, had Jackson look over it and probably lawyers. I don't think for a split second Nandy has read all of the documents and formed an opinion in isolation, I strongly suspect it is a shared view she is expressing.
Nandy and the SC have seen the documents, talked to the Spanish directly and heard their plans while we haven't. I think if one person has seen something and the other hasn't who is most likely to give an accurate judgement? That's certainly not to say we should automatically assume Nandy is 100% right but it sounds a lot more risky to assume she and everyone else in the know are all wrong when we have not seen what they have.
They have knowledge we are literally guessing. They might be wrong and those guessing it is all good will be vindicated but I fear they are more likely right. If it was only Nandy but SC were waving the flag for the Spanish then I'd be happier to dismiss her concerns but it seems like we are about to be taken out of admin and no one in the know is very enthusiastic about our saviours - that feels really off putting to me.
Last edited: