I am Charlie | Vital Football

I am Charlie

When I warned of islamification on this page about a month ago, I was pretty much disregarded by some posters who complained that this subject did not belong here.

https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=654911731320758&set=vb.300455573433044&type=3&theater
 
Ex-Ref - 9/1/2015 20:21

When I warned of islamification on this page about a month ago, I was pretty much disregarded by some posters who complained that this subject did not belong here.

https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=654911731320758&set=vb.300455573433044&type=3&theater
Click to expand...

I am Charlie ExRef That's why you can voice your opinion even though its vile

(Edited by Impalex 10.01.2015 09:11 to correct the quote facility)
 
Ex-Ref - 9/1/2015 20:21

When I warned of islamification on this page about a month ago, I was pretty much disregarded by some posters who complained that this subject did not belong here.

https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=654911731320758&set=vb.300455573433044&type=3&theater
Click to expand...

How about the millions of Muslims who have condemned these attacks? The peaceful ones who easily outnumber the terrorists? Clearly this is a terrible tragedy but please don't use it to condemn a whole religion.
 
Obviously, you replied to the post which had a video reference without viewing the video reference and then you voiced an opinion.
Just like the posters before you who clearly did the same. Therefore your opinion becomes invalid.
 
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1541859059434402&set=a.1480873275532981.1073741830.100008309680173&type=1&theater
 
Ex-Ref - 9/1/2015 20:40

Obviously, you replied to the post which had a video reference without viewing the video reference and then you voiced an opinion.
Just like the posters before you who clearly did the same. Therefore your opinion becomes invalid.
Click to expand...

Seen it ..... I am Charlie :clappy:
 
Ex-Ref - 9/1/2015 12:40

Obviously, you replied to the post which had a video reference without viewing the video reference and then you voiced an opinion.
Just like the posters before you who clearly did the same. Therefore your opinion becomes invalid.
Click to expand...

"Obviously" ? Did it not occur to you that perhaps people might have watched the video and come to a different opinion than yours?
 
Big Jack McGinley - 9/1/2015 20:50

Ex-Ref - 9/1/2015 12:40

Obviously, you replied to the post which had a video reference without viewing the video reference and then you voiced an opinion.
Just like the posters before you who clearly did the same. Therefore your opinion becomes invalid.
Click to expand...

"Obviously" ? Did it not occur to you that perhaps people might have watched the video and come to a different opinion than yours?
Click to expand...

Not just come to a different opinion, but questioned the legitimacy of the 'facts and figures' used within the video. I am sure somewhere there will be figures that dispute these. Do we know anyone radical enough to put a video together to use them.
 
Ex-Ref - 9/1/2015 21:22

Go on then, find the said evidence. Or are you just waffling?
Click to expand...

It took 10 seconds. By the way the article actually gives sources unlike the propaganda bullpoo of a video.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/8189231.stm
 
Amazing what you can do on you tube with just a few words to change the context of what is happening.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6HHjJjAb3kg&feature=youtu.be


BTW this will be deleted in 10 minutes.
 
Imping - 9/1/2015 13:51

Amazing what you can do on you tube with just a few words to change the context of what is happening.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6HHjJjAb3kg&feature=youtu.be


BTW this will be deleted in 10 minutes.
Click to expand...

:clappy:

I confess I was slightly surprised that the original video was posted and that we would accept it as some sort of "evidence". Obviously I was just meant to take at absolute face value what the completely impartial YouTube account holder had posted.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.