Harry Kane - Player Thread | Page 43 | Vital Football

Harry Kane - Player Thread

Will he stay or will he go?

  • Leave to City

    Votes: 2 18.2%

  • Leave to other PL team

    Votes: 2 18.2%

  • Leave to non-PL team

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Stay at Spurs

    Votes: 7 63.6%
  • Total voters
    11
  • Poll closed .
Gary Onedaysoon said:
At 26 years of age when would be the right time if not now? And whatever Villa offer him financially City will smash that. To me they look just the right team for him and at the right time.
Click to expand...
He may feel he still has unfinished business at Villa. He could find himself going from the captain & the heartbeat of his boyhood club to a bit part player like Mahrez.
 
steveperryman said:
He may feel he still has unfinished business at Villa. He could find himself going from the captain & the heartbeat of his boyhood club to a bit part player like Mahrez.
Click to expand...
I think Mahrez would be unhappy at that description. He was one of Pep's go to players last season, although it took him a couple of seasons to get there.
 
Gary Onedaysoon said:
I think Mahrez would be unhappy at that description. He was one of Pep's go to players last season, although it took him a couple of seasons to get there.
Click to expand...
My point exactly.

The best players want to play full stop... & Jack would be no different. Do we really believe he'd walk in there & take the place by storm. No, he'd find his options limited much in the same way as Mahrez & Stones did when they first arrived.
 
Gary Onedaysoon said:
Yes, he could if he really is 'one of our own'. If he genuinely has supported us since he was a boy, if he has the club in his heart like we do, then that trumps professional ambition. It would for me anyway.
Click to expand...
Don't disagree Gary, but I think he probably has reached a stage in his career, and an age, where he no doubt feels that he has paid his dues to us a few times over. If the choice was say PSG or Chelsea, or City or Chelsea, loyalty may come into it, but if Chelsea are the only Club willing to meet Levy's valuation ...........
 
SmithAndJones said:
Don't disagree Gary, but I think he probably has reached a stage in his career, and an age, where he no doubt feels that he has paid his dues to us a few times over. If the choice was say PSG or Chelsea, or City or Chelsea, loyalty may come into it, but if Chelsea are the only Club willing to meet Levy's valuation ...........
Click to expand...

So City have this gap between them and the chasing pack over a season in the leagiue. Chelsea knocked them out of the FA Cup and beat them in the CL final.

So why would City let Kane go to Chelsea when they know the player wants to go to them?

This is all good news for Spurs. Perhaps finally we're seeing a marketplace where the price is being driven up.

I'm expecting Lewandoski to be a pawn in this game as well. He'll be continually linked with City and Chelsea.
 
Yep I only see this happening in two ways...and both suck:

-Happens VERY late and we have no time to make moves to finish the window....(only positive is we don't have drama of waiting till next window and doing this all over again)

-Nothing happens and we are stuck with a player that doesn't want to be here and it will be the topic of every damn interview...etc...
 
80deg16minW said:
If I was Paratici I would complete the deal for Harry to City on August 16th.
Click to expand...
Why wait until the 16th? If there's a deal to be done do it asap.

Kane wouldn't be fit enough to play for Pep on the 15th and I'm sure Kane wouldn't want to make his debut for City at our ground so they'd find a way to exclude him anyway.
 
Gary Onedaysoon said:
Why wait until the 16th? If there's a deal to be done do it asap.

Kane wouldn't be fit enough to play for Pep on the 15th and I'm sure Kane wouldn't want to make his debut for City at our ground so they'd find a way to exclude him anyway.
Click to expand...

Perhaps Kane would make a remarkable recovery if he was at City.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.