BBJ
Father Of The Forum
Milliband really chewed him up and spat him out, didn't he?
It'll still get a second reading though, unfortunately.
The only good thing about COVID was it stopped people obsession with Brexit, sign it's all over , oh hang on.
It’s only just beginning...
Both brexit and covid I fear!
Sadly Blackford is one of those politicians that has you reaching for the off button.He stands up for his constituents (and country) well. He calls out the Tories well from what I see, but the constant “Scotland against it’s will” line wears thin down here. I don’t think it’s helpful for the argument he’s fighting actually
BB here is a view of the EUs democratic processes that I am fairly sure you will disagree with, but it is an alternative opinion.What is the EU? I mean, what do you believe the EU is?
I could be wrong here but I believe the EU is a democratic organisation made up of elected members from its constituent countries. A large part of the decision making process is conducted by the Prime Ministers/Presidents of those member states who are themselves elected by the people of their counties.
You comment about the EU as if they are Procter and Gamble or The Illuminati.
Wish COVID would fuck odd because Brexit could be perversely fascinating. The potential death toll from disruption, poverty and even violence is high, I’m not saying it will result in that and I hope it won’t but you never know if it goes badly. A hard Brexit with tariffs will result in those three.
That is their fault though 57, as I am sure you would agree... they said it was oven ready did they not? I'm just waiting for this crap to be over, but having signed a deal, they now want another one. The irony can't be lost no matter which way people voted?
Yes, what pees me off is we will never really know the impact, positive or negative, or indeed non impact, of brexit, because COVID has had such an effect on all of the European countries.
Now it is being done, as a point of interest, I'd love to have known if there was a wrong, a right or perhaps, a
Please expand your thoughts re Proctor and Gamble and The Illuminati and tell me how you arrive at that from anything I have said, because I have read and re read it and cant see how you would come to that conclusion.
BB here is a view of the EUs democratic processes that I am fairly sure you will disagree with, but it is an alternative opinion.
The European Union Is an Antidemocratic Disgrace - Jacobin
jacobinmag.com › 2019/05 › european-union-parliame...
The whole thing has been cooked up as a distraction from the equally criminal way they are handling the pandemic. It makes my blood boil how arrogant yet incompetent they are.So Boris The Blusterer got he wanted it seems. Quite the Tory backlash on the numbers though presuming the DUP were looking for another billion.
Lords might be interesting - especially as the bill doesn't do what it says on the tin.
Damn, You would have liked that, not a lot.That link doesn't work.
Working now BB dont know what went wrong there.That link doesn't work.
That post might have come across as harsh but I didn't mean it in that way. You are, of course, entitled to your opinion and I'd like to understand your opinion rather than criticise it because it's different to mine.
.
Working now BB dont know what went wrong there.
The European Union Is an Antidemocratic Disgrace - Jacobin
jacobinmag.com › 2019/05 › european-union-parliame...
And that Mike was the whole point of my original post, that the EU doesnt listen, ploughes on regardless and wont be diverted from its goals.Good read, well argued but also quite contradictory on the unquestionable power at play whilst acknowledging that MP's (all countries) automatically have a fail safe defence based on it's very own design and ignores the fact (or tries to) that the EU as a whole is nothing without sovereign states to begin with.
Also fails to draw the democratic distinction with the reality of democracy at both EU level and nation level but the EU is bad and by default, Parliament's must be good as a conclusion.
His bias is clear and he doesn't hide it (doesn't have to, just has to be honest which he is), but that piece would actually serve the effort that went into it far better if it was an argument as to how the EU needed to reform as he does highlight some good deficiencies - particularly, as said above, the national level get out to paint the EU as the big bad bogey when national Gov's are looking for an excuse to do something presumed as unpopular.
And that Mike was the whole point of my original post, that the EU doesnt listen, ploughes on regardless and wont be diverted from its goals.
It doesnt listen.
The case for change and reform is overwhelming and, as stated previously if the EU had listened to critisism, not just from the UK but others aswell then maybe there would have been no need for a referendum.
I chose him for his bias because the vast majority on here are for remain and will quote whatever suites their argument, and why not, we all have an opinion.