Green Tea - 7/4/2013 12:50
Labour, Labour, Labour = Welfare, Welfare, Welfare!
I think everyone agrees that when the Labour party came into power, in came the influx of scroungers. Whether it be through asylum, single mothers or down right benefit cheaters = the welfare state was a shambles. Too much hard earned tax payers money given out way, way too easy. Not mention all the labour "created" jobs within the public sector.
So the Cons have come in with a major clean up op, long overdue and much needed - to once again sort out a country half destroyed by the Labour party. Labour's recent answers are just in one ear and out the other, does anyone(other than the scroungers or pub sector workers even listen to them?)
"According to government statistics, there were 3.2 million children living in families with three or more children in 2010-11 and families with more than two children are more likely to be living in poverty based on standard measures of comparative income."
Poverty, breeds poverty = Lets have more kids even though we cannot afford them because the state can pay. The more you have, the more money you can claim, forget that we cant afford them that bit is irrelevant. You can get the state to pay for school uniforms, pay for school dinners = this on top of all the other state benefits along with housing etc. = Lets thank Labour for screwing up "Great" Britain.
What sane person has kids if they cannot support them? Its almost like child abuse! Shouldnt people sort their own lives out 1st before screwing up others?
Child A = Goes through school being a prick. Didnt listen, just dossed about, laughed and joked and then failed in his exams. = Poor job prospects or lives off welfare.
Child B = Goes through school and listens, learns, tries hard. Instead of going out drinking cider down the park, he stayed home and studied. Good exam results -= got a great job.
The system = punishes child B in high tax, high council tax for improving his life, for doing well. He has money worries, stress, hard working lifestyle.
Yet child A is the receiver of benefits,maybe has sky TV doesnt have money worries and can still screw around.
Message to country = just be a child A it makes more sense and you get better rewards.