It's not all that tiny in those groups to be fair, especially once you get past 35. It depends on your view of tiny and how much importance you put on a death. Someone in their 70's is not going to have any non-adult dependents but a 30 something dying is liable to have a dependent family. The increased social consequence perhaps mitigates the unlikeliness?
My assumption though is that the whole adult vaccination programme is about cutting potential transmission rates; again, to support the vulnerable.
I am not aware of any deaths attributed to COVID following a reasonable period of immunity. I know people who have had vaccines have died, but I'm not aware that they have done so after a point where they should absolutely have been protected?
if you are vaccinated, you should be practically protected if you are in the vulnerable category. So I don’t understand the reason for complete adult vaccination unless the vaccines are not as effective as they say.
The flu also kills a lot of vulnerable people yet we don’t see the same drive for the flu jab.
The domestic certificate proposal is back door coercion imo.