That's so right. When your whole system is designed around your wingbacks and you have to substitute both of them in the same game, that tells you something.Surely Conte will have seen enough of the wingbacks after last week and today.
A system/formation change is needed for the last few games.
If Conte persists with the wingbacks then surely other options need to tried there.
It's swings and roundabouts though. If you have a CF that barely moves, that doesn't try and find space, that doesn't bully the opponents' defenders, that basically just stands there for the whole match waiting for the perfect opportunity, then it's very hard for the players behind him to create an opportunity.The truth is that without Kane providing some magic that we struggle to create anything.
The last two games, Kane has been well marshaled and we have been severely lacking on ideas on how to create a single goal scoring chance.
A couple of things:Interesting post match interview with Eriksen "I've played under Conte so know how he likes to play and they played just as we expected". In other words we are predictable and therefore teams can go into a match with a plan to counteract our formation.
My real concern is I'm not even sure we won't feck up 5th place as well. We are spurs the masters of grabbing defeat from the jaws of victory. It's conceivable we may get only 4-5 points more, especially if Harry & Co continue to play as if it don't matter enough...well Harry it fecking does.It is very difficult to be objective where this current Spurs team is concerned, because of the Jekyll and Hyde nature of everything we see from them.
Based on the last two rounds of fixtures, Arsenal vs Chelsea and United, Spurs vs Brighton and Brentford, where we may reasonably have been expected to pull further away, Arsenal are the better team. They may not have the better players, but they've looked better managed, better organised, better motivated, and they've played better football, That may all change however by the time we play them in May, that's the way the season has been.
CL is still in our own hands. If we win our remaining five games we finish fourth. Anybody want to bet on us beating Liverpool and Arsenal, and not slipping up against Leicester, Burnley or Norwich? Personally I think that the Brighton and Brentford games have cost us CL football next season, but as I've said before, our being in the Europa League won't necessarily be a bad thing.
My biggest concern is that I don't get the impression that anybody inside the Club (other than probably Levy) cares as much about what the Club achieves, than the guys on here. Dier's post match interview yesterday made my blood boil. I would have expected him to be angry, embarassed, apologetic, optimistic, just something. Instead he was just sort of 'what will be will be'.
As for Conte, over the course of the last two games he's just looked drained of all of his natural energy. I think he's on the train to Paris already. The next big talking point will unquestionably be whether Pochettino is on the one in the other direction.
There were no highlights....well not from us anyway.Was it all that bad ?
I didn’t see the game , havent seen any “‘highlights “.
I guess when you don’t have one shot on target over the last two games ,….. is was that bad .
It's swings and roundabouts though. If you have a CF that barely moves, that doesn't try and find space, that doesn't bully the opponents' defenders, that basically just stands there for the whole match waiting for the perfect opportunity, then it's very hard for the players behind him to create an opportunity.
Son and Kulu struggled all afternoon but you could see that they were at least trying to make things happen.
Early in the second half I would have taken Kane, Sess and Royal off, and replaced them with Berg, Moura and one other CB (switch to a back 4 with Romero and Davies as FBs). It's always a risk making three substitutions so early but at that point, it's clear, we were going nowhere and there was nothing to lose.
Sorry Gary, what I meant was that Kane finds it very difficult when he comes up against a man marker situation.
Last week at Brighton, Bissouma sat in that are between the defense and the midfield that Kane like to roam into and didn’t give him a kick. Kane was ineffective all game.
This week, he was marked tightly by Pontus Jansson who bossed him all game. I can’t remember a meaningful ball or header than Kane won.
It reminded me of the 3 games verse Chelsea earlier in the season. The same thing happened with Rudiger. He didn’t give Kane an inch in any of the games and Kane struggled as a result.
I appreciate that there is a perceived issue about Kane’s work rate but surely Conte is happy with him as he plays the full game every week regardless of how well he performs.
My problem is that, goals win you games, shots on target get you goals. If Kane is ineffective at creating opportunities in games then the wingbacks need to step up and create from wide positions. Our current bunch can’t do that so a change of formation/personal is needed.
Bergwijn and Moura need to be introduced as at least they carry the threat of a goal or assist.
From yesterdays starting 11, we only really expect a goal to come from Kane, Son or Kulusevski.
I agree about returning to a back 4, considering the lack of ability in our FB’s to play the wingback role effectively. My guess however is that Conte doesn’t trust any of our current CB’s to perform in a back 4 so the only other option is to play Bergwijn or Moura at RWB. At least they will run at and attack the opposition.
Lloris
Sanchez Romero Davies
Bergwijn Hojbjerg Bentancur Kulusevski
Kane
Moura Son
That’s what I’d like to see. The wingbacks attacking. Kane in the 10 role with Sonny and Moura pressing from the top end of the pitch.
Same her TQ,Iv been doing it for the last 45 years,lost touch with my beloved Spurs in the 80s when I was travelling and living abroad but fell back in love with them in the 90s, I just can't take much more of the false dawns and being constantly let down. I couldn't give a toss if Kane,Son and Conte fucked off tomorrow,there's something rotten with our clubs mentality that badly needs a clear out from top to bottom. Another weekend ruined.I have invested so much into this club emotionally over 60+ years of supporting them I'm not sure I have much if any more to give now.
So the question is, S10, why? Why is a relative journeyman pro defender able to mark Kane out of the game so easily? Ditto Brighton last week and other teams before them.Sorry Gary, what I meant was that Kane finds it very difficult when he comes up against a man marker situation.
Last week at Brighton, Bissouma sat in that are between the defense and the midfield that Kane like to roam into and didn’t give him a kick. Kane was ineffective all game.
This week, he was marked tightly by Pontus Jansson who bossed him all game. I can’t remember a meaningful ball or header than Kane won.
It reminded me of the 3 games verse Chelsea earlier in the season. The same thing happened with Rudiger. He didn’t give Kane an inch in any of the games and Kane struggled as a result.
I appreciate that there is a perceived issue about Kane’s work rate but surely Conte is happy with him as he plays the full game every week regardless of how well he performs.
My problem is that, goals win you games, shots on target get you goals. If Kane is ineffective at creating opportunities in games then the wingbacks need to step up and create from wide positions. Our current bunch can’t do that so a change of formation/personal is needed.
Bergwijn and Moura need to be introduced as at least they carry the threat of a goal or assist.
From yesterdays starting 11, we only really expect a goal to come from Kane, Son or Kulusevski.
I agree about returning to a back 4, considering the lack of ability in our FB’s to play the wingback role effectively. My guess however is that Conte doesn’t trust any of our current CB’s to perform in a back 4 so the only other option is to play Bergwijn or Moura at RWB. At least they will run at and attack the opposition.
Lloris
Sanchez Romero Davies
Bergwijn Hojbjerg Bentancur Kulusevski
Kane
Moura Son
That’s what I’d like to see. The wingbacks attacking. Kane in the 10 role with Sonny and Moura pressing from the top end of the pitch.
So the question is, S10, why? Why is a relative journeyman pro defender able to mark Kane out of the game so easily? Ditto Brighton last week and other teams before them.
It's not so long ago that Kane bullied the PL's very best defenders. Yet now he allows himself to be bullied out of the game by run-of-the-mill defenders.
So, either he hasn't got what it takes anymore or he's just picking and choosing when and against whom he decides to turn it on. Either way having a player like this in the team - and the untouchable aura that comes with it - is a barrier to progress. I genuinely think we'll progress much faster next season if he's no longer part of the setup.
It's swings and roundabouts though. If you have a CF that barely moves, that doesn't try and find space, that doesn't bully the opponents' defenders, that basically just stands there for the whole match waiting for the perfect opportunity, then it's very hard for the players behind him to create an opportunity.
Son and Kulu struggled all afternoon but you could see that they were at least trying to make things happen.
Early in the second half I would have taken Kane, Sess and Royal off, and replaced them with Berg, Moura and one other CB (switch to a back 4 with Romero and Davies as FBs). It's always a risk making three substitutions so early but at that point, it's clear, we were going nowhere and there was nothing to lose.