How have you managed to get this original document, and where can we civilians see it?
How have you managed to get this original document, and where can we civilians see it?
Does n't this show at 5.14 that if Forest had sold Brennan Johnson for €50M on 30th June, there would have been no breach, or a much lesser one that might attract no penalty?.
Yes that looks like the formula now.8oints maximum so it’s lower than administration. Everton must get a minimum of 3 which could happen because double jeopardy is a very strong mitigation
According to Sky we were £34m over the limit, if that is the case then we must have been in breach but by a lesser amount in January. Which in turn means that in January the club knowing we were already in breach made a conscious decision to spend a significant amount more on Wood, Shelvey, Felipe, Navas etc., knowing full well that it would put us even more over the top.
That being the case then the club clearly took a calculated gamble, what is unclear at this stage is whether that gamble has paid off, we stayed up last year thus picking up another years Sky money, but have now just paid the price & it is yet to be seen if that will mean we pay the ultimate price this year.
Right or wrong the club took the decision knowing the rules & I suppose in those circumstances a sanction has to be applied, so 4 points is probably about right. What we don't know of course what this alleged dialogue between the club & the PL actually amounted to & I would love it if the club decided to publish it
Being said that if we appeal and lose a further two points will be added.
That's fucking bullshit if true. Dictatorship
According to Sky we were £34m over the limit, if that is the case then we must have been in breach but by a lesser amount in January. Which in turn means that in January the club knowing we were already in breach made a conscious decision to spend a significant amount more on Wood, Shelvey, Felipe, Navas etc., knowing full well that it would put us even more over the top.
That being the case then the club clearly took a calculated gamble, what is unclear at this stage is whether that gamble has paid off, we stayed up last year thus picking up another years Sky money, but have now just paid the price & it is yet to be seen if that will mean we pay the ultimate price this year.
Right or wrong the club took the decision knowing the rules & I suppose in those circumstances a sanction has to be applied, so 4 points is probably about right. What we don't know of course what this alleged dialogue between the club & the PL actually amounted to & I would love it if the club decided to publish it
Exactly what Ive been saying-only thing that could have saved us was a binding agreement for 35m -we gambled, we lost , we are in the shitAccording to Sky we were £34m over the limit, if that is the case then we must have been in breach but by a lesser amount in January. Which in turn means that in January the club knowing we were already in breach made a conscious decision to spend a significant amount more on Wood, Shelvey, Felipe, Navas etc., knowing full well that it would put us even more over the top.
That being the case then the club clearly took a calculated gamble, what is unclear at this stage is whether that gamble has paid off, we stayed up last year thus picking up another years Sky money, but have now just paid the price & it is yet to be seen if that will mean we pay the ultimate price this year.
Right or wrong the club took the decision knowing the rules & I suppose in those circumstances a sanction has to be applied, so 4 points is probably about right. What we don't know of course what this alleged dialogue between the club & the PL actually amounted to & I would love it if the club decided to publish it