Gary Onedaysoon
*Prediction Champion 20/21 & 21/22*
Totally agree.I don't even think this is the heart of the matter.
I believe Levy promised kane he could leave if x conditions were met. The truth is an agreement to leave needs a value agreed and it seems to be the point that Charlie dipshit didn't iron out.
I don't think Levy has failed to adhere to the agreement (and you know I'd criticise him if I felt he had). I just don't think the conditions were met.
Hopefully this is a learning point for Charlie and his massive ego.
I would rather kane have left and we let Paratici rebuild but Levy is right to pull any plug at this point as we'd be held hostage to unreasonable demands for any half decent striker.
An informal 'gentleman's agreement' is totally meaningless without conditions being agreed.
If the conditions were agreed (between the club and Kane's camp) then City didn't meet those conditions.
And if conditions weren't agreed then the 'gentleman's agreement' was open to interpretation. And clearly City, Team Kane and Spurs had different interpretations of what that meant.
What's also odd is that City and Spurs had apparently been discussing this move behind the scenes for the past year. What on earth were they talking about to end up so far apart?