Brexit Day! | Page 44 | Vital Football

Brexit Day!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Polly 433 said:
Someone famous once said something along the lines of “definition of madness is repeating the same thing and being surprised when getting the same outcome”.

Bit like Forest at home.
Click to expand...


A bit like Plums and his stalking
 

Attachments

  • WeirdStalkerboy.jpg
    WeirdStalkerboy.jpg
    28.8 KB · Views: 4
da fuq said:
Now listen just because I choose not to engage does not mean anything other than sometimes i cant be arsed

Case in point recently with LIEking

I've given up I gave him examples and explanations and he just totally ignored like he was blind to it so I've now given up

As for when we were talking about neoliberalism you contradicted yourself in the very first couple of sentences about New Labour - did they have Neo Liberal traits that were very much aligned with Thatchers govts or not? It's a simple question

Also you are a wiki copy and paste king as proven in the past and recently with your almost word for word verbatim explanation of socialism

Its obvious from your weekly thread on fan comments ( which are great by the way )

You love a bit of Ctrl c and Ctrl v

Sometimes I just do it because it really does get on your beak

As for being a nut nut that's very nice of you

You have said far worse things in the past and not only to me so I'll take that as you showing signs of maturity and maybe a bit of humility

I would like to think that people would say that someone who is an actual nut nut is someone who for years trys many different methods of engagement to get someone to give up thier personal details like a stalker on the vinegar stroke

But you know that's just my personal experience with you
Click to expand...

You're the only person who bangs on about personal details and tracking people down, nobody else does.

I didn't contradict myself, nuance isn't contradiction you plum. In your world is it really as simple as you either belong in box a or box b?

Anyway you are still incapable of answering (both myself and Radford), which I shouldn't be surprised about. As I said you are the Tory parties very best friend.
 
Calvin Plummer said:
You're the only person who bangs on about personal details and tracking people down, nobody else does.

I didn't contradict myself, nuance isn't contradiction you plum. In your world is it really as simple as you either belong in box a or box b?

Anyway you are still incapable of answering (both myself and Radford), which I shouldn't be surprised about. As I said you are the Tory parties very best friend.
Click to expand...

So New Labour had nuanced Neo Liberal traits?..thanks for clearing that up

So let me get this right you have spent the best part of a decade PMing at various points trying to get my personal details which then spilled out on to the threads as you keep asking for my details and I'm the one who bangs on about it stalker boy?


I've never asked for any ones personal details or past work information or tried to track anyone down

I'm not into scamming people which it does feel like you could be or it could be that you are needy of a friend
Possible bunny boiler?

Anyway its fucking weird


Jesus wept you are a card fella
 
da fuq said:
So New Labour had nuanced Neo Liberal traits?..thanks for clearing that up

So let me get this right you have spent the best part of a decade PMing at various points trying to get my personal details which then spilled out on to the threads as you keep asking for my details and I'm the one who bangs on about it stalker boy?


I've never asked for any ones personal details or past work information or tried to track anyone down

I'm not into scamming people which it does feel like you could be or it could be that you are needy of a friend
Possible bunny boiler?

Anyway its fucking weird


Jesus wept you are a card fella
Click to expand...

What are you babbling about? Copy and paste these PMs you absolute fruit loop. I've 0 interest in who you are, beyond obvious concern for those in your local community.

Of course you can have different policies that straddle different philosophies, are you really so dense as to believe otherwise?

Radford and I named a dozen plus major New Labour policies and you chose to completely ignore them all, just as you are now, just as you did on your claims to be a socialist property owner and just as you did with your BBC career (though to be fair you eventually backtracked and admitted you were never an employee).

So, have a bash at actually answering our questions or continue to be perceived as a fuckwit who knows the square route of fuck all.
 
Calvin Plummer said:
What are you babbling about? Copy and paste these PMs you absolute fruit loop. I've 0 interest in who you are, beyond obvious concern for those in your local community.

Of course you can have different policies that straddle different philosophies, are you really so dense as to believe otherwise?

Radford and I named a dozen plus major New Labour policies and you chose to completely ignore them all, just as you are now, just as you did on your claims to be a socialist property owner and just as you did with your BBC career (though to be fair you eventually backtracked and admitted you were never an employee).

So, have a bash at actually answering our questions or continue to be perceived as a fuckwit who knows the square route of fuck all.
Click to expand...


I never backtracked I just didnt want to give you the details after you tried umpteen times to get my personal information you absolute card

I've lead you a merry dance over years and you know it

Like the time I asked you some basic questions about post production editing techniques and threw in some fake shit and you said you were going to ask your "Dad" bless

Then you came back with some absolute drivel that you had just read online and actually fell for the traps I set...all this to try to live out this fantasy about your father and the BBC

Embarrassing

And just because i cant be arsed with the whole Neo Liberal nunaced debate with a mental who is close to having a meltdown

It was you being the dense one by piping up about New Labour and Neo Liberalism

My point was they took Neo Liberalism to new heights and they did I didn't say they had not used other philosophies

You had made a movie in your head an ran with it you started making assumptions about what I had said and Radford too

I didn't disagree with the points he was making

Try and do a bit of reading fella from one of many bits of information available about Neo Liberalism and New Labour that aren't so nuanced


https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2003/aug/06/society.labour


This little bit should help if your tiny mind cannot understand what came before it


"This was not likely to be reversed by a mere rotation of the electoral wheel of fortune. The historic opportunities for the left required imaginative thinking and decisive action in the early stages of taking power, signalling a new direction. The other choice was, of course, to adapt to Thatcherite, neo-liberal terrain. There were plenty of indications that this would be New Labour's preferred direction. And so it turned out. In a profound sense, New Labour has adapted to neo-liberal terrain - but in a distinctive way. "

That is how to copy past plums you know make sure people know its a quote...not passing shit off as your own from wiki to make yourself seem big and clever
 
Last edited:
da fuq said:
I never backtracked I just didnt want to give you the details after you tried umpteen times to get my personal information you absolute card

I've lead you a merry dance over years and you know it

Like the time I asked you some basic questions about post production editing techniques and through in some fake shit and you said you were going to ask your "Dad" bless

Then you came back with some absolute drivel that you had just read online and actually fell for the traps I set...all this to try to live out this fantasy about your father and the BBC

Embarrassing

And just because i cant be arsed with the whole Neo Liberal nunaced debate with a mental who is close to having a meltdown

It was you being the dense one by piping up about New Labour and Neo Liberalism

My point was they took Neo Liberalism to new heights and they did I didn't say they had not used other philosophies

You had made a movie in your head an ran with it you started making assumptions about what I had said and Radford too

I didn't disagree with the points he was making

Try and do a bit of reading fella from one of many bits of information available about Neo Liberalism and New Labour that aren't so nuanced


https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2003/aug/06/society.labour


This little bit should help if your tiny mind cannot understand what came before it


"This was not likely to be reversed by a mere rotation of the electoral wheel of fortune. The historic opportunities for the left required imaginative thinking and decisive action in the early stages of taking power, signalling a new direction. The other choice was, of course, to adapt to Thatcherite, neo-liberal terrain. There were plenty of indications that this would be New Labour's preferred direction. And so it turned out. In a profound sense, New Labour has adapted to neo-liberal terrain - but in a distinctive way. "

That is how to copy past plums you know make sure people know its a quote...not passing shit off as your own from wiki to make yourself seem big and clever
Click to expand...

So as usual more delusional white noise and 0 actual direct answers. Don't ever change lol
 
Calvin Plummer said:
So as usual more delusional white noise and 0 actual direct answers. Don't ever change lol
Click to expand...

Calvin Plummer said:
So as usual more delusional white noise and 0 actual direct answers. Don't ever change lol
Click to expand...


Oh do pipe down

They were Neo liberal you mental, there was an introduction into internal markets for the public sector, with wholesale privatisation (outsourcing workers onto worse pay etc) an increase in the gap between what managers got in terms of pay compared to staff etc etc. They sold the idea of progression in society would be based on the talent of people in suits.

They did have some direct control over what changed (the public sector) but they splurged on new liberal policies.

And any introduced bit of legislation was so minimal or wafer fin it was as to be almost pointless.

They also increased meagre union rights alongside with the decline in union membership, with minimum pay, which gave way to more precarious work on zero hour contracts which is now part of the culture.

Blairism was just Neo Liberal Thatcherism dressed up as a gender reveal party


How long is it going to take for you to look up something on wiki and copy and paste

Embarrassing
 
Last edited:
De Fuq. Voting for the new labour leader has now opened and talking about labour and neoliberalism have you read the latest articles in the Trade Unions against EU (TUAEU).
 
Polly 433 said:
De Fuq. Voting for the new labour leader has now opened and talking about labour and neoliberalism have you read the latest articles in the Trade Unions against EU (TUAEU).
Click to expand...


No I haven't I will give it a try once Plums has come back to me with some copy and paste


Or the link to his Dads IMDB page that he has said that he was going to post a few times in the past

Bless

His Dad
 
da fuq said:
Oh do pipe down

They were Neo liberal you mental, there was an introduction into internal markets for the public sector, with wholesale privatisation (outsourcing workers onto worse pay etc) an increase in the gap between what managers got in terms of pay compared to staff etc etc. They sold the idea of progression in society would be based on the talent of people in suits.

They did have some direct control over what changed (the public sector) but they splurged on new liberal policies.

And any introduced bit of legislation was so minimal or wafer fin it was as to be almost pointless.

They also increased meagre union rights alongside with the decline in union membership, with minimum pay, which gave way to more precarious work on zero hour contracts which is now part of the culture.

Blairism was just Neo Liberal Thatcherism dressed up as a gender reveal party


How long is it going to take for you to look up something on wiki and copy and paste

Embarrassing
Click to expand...

I'm still awaiting you answering a direct question, of the policies we listed which were Neo Liberal and why? It isn't complicated and all the white noise in the world can't disguise your inability to answer a simple question.
 
da fuq said:
No I haven't I will give it a try once Plums has come back to me with some copy and paste


Or the link to his Dads IMDB page that he has said that he was going to post a few times in the past

Bless

His Dad
Click to expand...

More white noise, you were the one who had to embarrassingly backtrack and admit you'd lied about being a BBC employee.
 
da fuq said:
No I haven't I will give it a try once Plums has come back to me with some copy and paste


Or the link to his Dads IMDB page that he has said that he was going to post a few times in the past

Bless

His Dad
Click to expand...
Do you get a vote in the Labour leadership election?

I know CP doesn't, do you?
 
Calvin Plummer said:
I'm still awaiting you answering a direct question, of the policies we listed which were Neo Liberal and why? It isn't complicated and all the white noise in the world can't disguise your inability to answer a simple question.
Click to expand...


Erm daft lad I've already answered that



Struggles on the www
 
Pope John XXIII said:
Do you get a vote in the Labour leadership election?

I know CP doesn't, do you?
Click to expand...

Nice timing

Just got this message sent to me not only 15 minutes ago

"Ballots are go! Vote RLB for leader. Leigh, Lauren, and Nav (BAME) for NEC. Back the policies, vote socialist. Info: http://bit.ly/NECVOE Unsub: bit.ly/ojh"

Bit of copy and paste for CP to get twitching over
 
Last edited:
da fuq said:
Nice timing

Just got this message sent to me not only 15 minutes ago

"Ballots are go! Vote RLB for leader. Leigh, Lauren, and Nav (BAME) for NEC. Back the policies, vote socialist. Info: http://bit.ly/NECVOTE Unsub: bit.ly/ojyh"

Bit of copy and paste for CP to get twitching over
Click to expand...
Funnily enough I have had phone calls from both Starmer and Nandy's campaigns but not a sausage from Long Bailey.

No ballot yet either. No idea why they feel the need for a month to vote.
 
Calvin Plummer said:
More white noise, you were the one who had to embarrassingly backtrack and admit you'd lied about being a BBC employee.
Click to expand...


Erm really you dont half talk some shite

Have you had an aneurysm

Show me this actual backtracking and lieing


What I have done is to make sure that a weirdo like your self has not got my details

So just in the last few posts you have admitted that you have in the past tried to get my BBC employee details, no?

Because I'm pretty sure if we go back a few posts you said have never done anything of the sort

Have you had another accident on your bike because you obviously have some brain damage to make shit up like you are now!

Fucking bizarro weirdo

🤣🤣🤣
 
Pope John XXIII said:
Funnily enough I have had phone calls from both Starmer and Nandy's campaigns but not a sausage from Long Bailey.

No ballot yet either. No idea why they feel the need for a month to vote.
Click to expand...


I've probably had calls too but I generally ignore numbers that I dont recognise and wait for a text message or answer message for my work number and personal number
 
Status
Not open for further replies.