The Fear - 22/9/2013 10:12
I'd need to see the structure of the plan BBJ, but instinctively against the house of lords and the ruling from hereditary peers, people of privileged and indeed, the Church.
Should really have gone years ago or seen a more radical reform.
sirdennis - 30/9/2013 14:51
Yes they just seem obsessed with point scoring and "trendy" soundbites.
They should concentrate on the real job in hand
Wurzel - 30/9/2013 13:19
Very dull speech from the Chancellor today. The idea that we are going to pay off the debt anytime soon is laughable.
The Fear - 30/9/2013 13:05
So kefkat, what you are kind of saying is... I was right.... ?
:10:
OnMeHeadFred - 30/9/2013 16:27
Wurzel - 30/9/2013 13:19
Very dull speech from the Chancellor today. The idea that we are going to pay off the debt anytime soon is laughable.
Wouldn't it be thrilling if the Chancellor had the guts to mention Hayek, von Mises and Rothbard, rather than treat us all like children in need of a reassuring fairytale.
We might take him seriously then.
Villan Of The North - 1/10/2013 08:23
OnMeHeadFred - 30/9/2013 16:27
Wurzel - 30/9/2013 13:19
Very dull speech from the Chancellor today. The idea that we are going to pay off the debt anytime soon is laughable.
Wouldn't it be thrilling if the Chancellor had the guts to mention Hayek, von Mises and Rothbard, rather than treat us all like children in need of a reassuring fairytale.
We might take him seriously then.
Perhaps he would if a)he thought it was relevant b)his audience, the general public, would have a clue what he was talking about c)he wanted to turn the UK into the 51st state of America.
OnMeHeadFred - 1/10/2013 10:52
Villan Of The North - 1/10/2013 08:23
OnMeHeadFred - 30/9/2013 16:27
Wurzel - 30/9/2013 13:19
Very dull speech from the Chancellor today. The idea that we are going to pay off the debt anytime soon is laughable.
Wouldn't it be thrilling if the Chancellor had the guts to mention Hayek, von Mises and Rothbard, rather than treat us all like children in need of a reassuring fairytale.
We might take him seriously then.
Perhaps he would if a)he thought it was relevant b)his audience, the general public, would have a clue what he was talking about c)he wanted to turn the UK into the 51st state of America.
I would go for b.
I wouldn't go so far as to claim that most Lefties can explain Marx's labour theory of value but when it comes to explaining Tory philosophy your average Tory voter hasn't got a clue.
It is sad to say.
Villan Of The North - 1/10/2013 10:05
OnMeHeadFred - 1/10/2013 10:52
Villan Of The North - 1/10/2013 08:23
OnMeHeadFred - 30/9/2013 16:27
Wurzel - 30/9/2013 13:19
Very dull speech from the Chancellor today. The idea that we are going to pay off the debt anytime soon is laughable.
Wouldn't it be thrilling if the Chancellor had the guts to mention Hayek, von Mises and Rothbard, rather than treat us all like children in need of a reassuring fairytale.
We might take him seriously then.
Perhaps he would if a)he thought it was relevant b)his audience, the general public, would have a clue what he was talking about c)he wanted to turn the UK into the 51st state of America.
I would go for b.
I wouldn't go so far as to claim that most Lefties can explain Marx's labour theory of value but when it comes to explaining Tory philosophy your average Tory voter hasn't got a clue.
It is sad to say.
This single post sums up, for me, your postings on all things political, at least what I have read. You are polarising the issues when in reality all UK main stream parties lie very much in the middle ground between these two philosophies. Labour are not Marxists and Conservative are not classical liberals. In fact the only countries that can claim to be genuinely classically liberal are 3rd world countries who lack the infrastructure to be anything else. Although the USA are making a good attempt at it with their healthcare system and banking regulation (or lack there of) but the UK and indeed all of the so called right wing Europeans in today's Europe are no where near.
OnMeHeadFred - 30/9/2013 15:27
Wurzel - 30/9/2013 13:19
Very dull speech from the Chancellor today. The idea that we are going to pay off the debt anytime soon is laughable.
Wouldn't it be thrilling if the Chancellor had the guts to mention Hayek, von Mises and Rothbard, rather than treat us all like children in need of a reassuring fairytale.
We might take him seriously then.
OnMeHeadFred - 1/10/2013 11:45
Villan Of The North - 1/10/2013 10:05
OnMeHeadFred - 1/10/2013 10:52
Villan Of The North - 1/10/2013 08:23
OnMeHeadFred - 30/9/2013 16:27
Wurzel - 30/9/2013 13:19
Very dull speech from the Chancellor today. The idea that we are going to pay off the debt anytime soon is laughable.
Wouldn't it be thrilling if the Chancellor had the guts to mention Hayek, von Mises and Rothbard, rather than treat us all like children in need of a reassuring fairytale.
We might take him seriously then.
Perhaps he would if a)he thought it was relevant b)his audience, the general public, would have a clue what he was talking about c)he wanted to turn the UK into the 51st state of America.
I would go for b.
I wouldn't go so far as to claim that most Lefties can explain Marx's labour theory of value but when it comes to explaining Tory philosophy your average Tory voter hasn't got a clue.
It is sad to say.
This single post sums up, for me, your postings on all things political, at least what I have read. You are polarising the issues when in reality all UK main stream parties lie very much in the middle ground between these two philosophies. Labour are not Marxists and Conservative are not classical liberals. In fact the only countries that can claim to be genuinely classically liberal are 3rd world countries who lack the infrastructure to be anything else. Although the USA are making a good attempt at it with their healthcare system and banking regulation (or lack there of) but the UK and indeed all of the so called right wing Europeans in today's Europe are no where near.
All I was saying was that I have met a lot of Lefties in my time who understood the fundamentals of Socialism but I have never met a Tory voter who could explain Adam Smith, or monetarism.
Villan Of The North - 2/10/2013 09:34
OnMeHeadFred - 1/10/2013 11:45
Villan Of The North - 1/10/2013 10:05
OnMeHeadFred - 1/10/2013 10:52
Villan Of The North - 1/10/2013 08:23
OnMeHeadFred - 30/9/2013 16:27
Wurzel - 30/9/2013 13:19
Very dull speech from the Chancellor today. The idea that we are going to pay off the debt anytime soon is laughable.
Wouldn't it be thrilling if the Chancellor had the guts to mention Hayek, von Mises and Rothbard, rather than treat us all like children in need of a reassuring fairytale.
We might take him seriously then.
Perhaps he would if a)he thought it was relevant b)his audience, the general public, would have a clue what he was talking about c)he wanted to turn the UK into the 51st state of America.
I would go for b.
I wouldn't go so far as to claim that most Lefties can explain Marx's labour theory of value but when it comes to explaining Tory philosophy your average Tory voter hasn't got a clue.
It is sad to say.
This single post sums up, for me, your postings on all things political, at least what I have read. You are polarising the issues when in reality all UK main stream parties lie very much in the middle ground between these two philosophies. Labour are not Marxists and Conservative are not classical liberals. In fact the only countries that can claim to be genuinely classically liberal are 3rd world countries who lack the infrastructure to be anything else. Although the USA are making a good attempt at it with their healthcare system and banking regulation (or lack there of) but the UK and indeed all of the so called right wing Europeans in today's Europe are no where near.
All I was saying was that I have met a lot of Lefties in my time who understood the fundamentals of Socialism but I have never met a Tory voter who could explain Adam Smith, or monetarism.
Well now you've met one :14:
Wurzel - 2/10/2013 09:30
Cameron must be fuming this morning after that disgusting paper the Daily Mail steals the limelight with the most ridiculous story about Red Ed's dad. Not only does it reflect poorly on that rag, but it damages the image of the party it claims to support.