The Politics Thread | Page 8 | Vital Football

The Politics Thread

Yes they just seem obsessed with point scoring and "trendy" soundbites.

They should concentrate on the real job in hand
 
The Fear - 22/9/2013 10:12

I'd need to see the structure of the plan BBJ, but instinctively against the house of lords and the ruling from hereditary peers, people of privileged and indeed, the Church.

Should really have gone years ago or seen a more radical reform.


Indeed. So much better now it's filled with the cronies of whoever happens to be in power at any given time.




 
sirdennis - 30/9/2013 14:51

Yes they just seem obsessed with point scoring and "trendy" soundbites.

They should concentrate on the real job in hand

Or a real hand job.... Actually, maybe that is an avenue to explore for the dolies!
 
Wurzel - 30/9/2013 13:19

Very dull speech from the Chancellor today. The idea that we are going to pay off the debt anytime soon is laughable.

Wouldn't it be thrilling if the Chancellor had the guts to mention Hayek, von Mises and Rothbard, rather than treat us all like children in need of a reassuring fairytale.

We might take him seriously then.
 
If he told the truth the public would panic. How did it go in that film

[youtube=MMzd40i8TfA]
 
I see Farage has come out and said he could do a deal with The Tories in the media: I presume that is in the way of a coalition if they need to power share again.

That will please the Liberals & Labour diehards
 
OnMeHeadFred - 30/9/2013 16:27

Wurzel - 30/9/2013 13:19

Very dull speech from the Chancellor today. The idea that we are going to pay off the debt anytime soon is laughable.

Wouldn't it be thrilling if the Chancellor had the guts to mention Hayek, von Mises and Rothbard, rather than treat us all like children in need of a reassuring fairytale.

We might take him seriously then.

Perhaps he would if a)he thought it was relevant b)his audience, the general public, would have a clue what he was talking about c)he wanted to turn the UK into the 51st state of America.
 
The messages coming out of the Conservative conference are very negative and hardly inclusive. It seems they are so terrified of UKIP that they are trying to out nasty them. Whoever has set the agenda for this conference needs his bumps feeling.
 
Villan Of The North - 1/10/2013 08:23

OnMeHeadFred - 30/9/2013 16:27

Wurzel - 30/9/2013 13:19

Very dull speech from the Chancellor today. The idea that we are going to pay off the debt anytime soon is laughable.

Wouldn't it be thrilling if the Chancellor had the guts to mention Hayek, von Mises and Rothbard, rather than treat us all like children in need of a reassuring fairytale.

We might take him seriously then.

Perhaps he would if a)he thought it was relevant b)his audience, the general public, would have a clue what he was talking about c)he wanted to turn the UK into the 51st state of America.

I would go for b.

I wouldn't go so far as to claim that most Lefties can explain Marx's labour theory of value but when it comes to explaining Tory philosophy your average Tory voter hasn't got a clue.

It is sad to say.
 
OnMeHeadFred - 1/10/2013 10:52

Villan Of The North - 1/10/2013 08:23

OnMeHeadFred - 30/9/2013 16:27

Wurzel - 30/9/2013 13:19

Very dull speech from the Chancellor today. The idea that we are going to pay off the debt anytime soon is laughable.

Wouldn't it be thrilling if the Chancellor had the guts to mention Hayek, von Mises and Rothbard, rather than treat us all like children in need of a reassuring fairytale.

We might take him seriously then.

Perhaps he would if a)he thought it was relevant b)his audience, the general public, would have a clue what he was talking about c)he wanted to turn the UK into the 51st state of America.

I would go for b.

I wouldn't go so far as to claim that most Lefties can explain Marx's labour theory of value but when it comes to explaining Tory philosophy your average Tory voter hasn't got a clue.

It is sad to say.

This single post sums up, for me, your postings on all things political, at least what I have read. You are polarising the issues when in reality all UK main stream parties lie very much in the middle ground between these two philosophies. Labour are not Marxists and Conservative are not classical liberals. In fact the only countries that can claim to be genuinely classically liberal are 3rd world countries who lack the infrastructure to be anything else. Although the USA are making a good attempt at it with their healthcare system and banking regulation (or lack there of) but the UK and indeed all of the so called right wing Europeans in today's Europe are no where near.
 
Villan Of The North - 1/10/2013 10:05

OnMeHeadFred - 1/10/2013 10:52

Villan Of The North - 1/10/2013 08:23

OnMeHeadFred - 30/9/2013 16:27

Wurzel - 30/9/2013 13:19

Very dull speech from the Chancellor today. The idea that we are going to pay off the debt anytime soon is laughable.

Wouldn't it be thrilling if the Chancellor had the guts to mention Hayek, von Mises and Rothbard, rather than treat us all like children in need of a reassuring fairytale.

We might take him seriously then.

Perhaps he would if a)he thought it was relevant b)his audience, the general public, would have a clue what he was talking about c)he wanted to turn the UK into the 51st state of America.

I would go for b.

I wouldn't go so far as to claim that most Lefties can explain Marx's labour theory of value but when it comes to explaining Tory philosophy your average Tory voter hasn't got a clue.

It is sad to say.

This single post sums up, for me, your postings on all things political, at least what I have read. You are polarising the issues when in reality all UK main stream parties lie very much in the middle ground between these two philosophies. Labour are not Marxists and Conservative are not classical liberals. In fact the only countries that can claim to be genuinely classically liberal are 3rd world countries who lack the infrastructure to be anything else. Although the USA are making a good attempt at it with their healthcare system and banking regulation (or lack there of) but the UK and indeed all of the so called right wing Europeans in today's Europe are no where near.

All I was saying was that I have met a lot of Lefties in my time who understood the fundamentals of Socialism but I have never met a Tory voter who could explain Adam Smith, or monetarism.

Tory voters just drone on about immigrants and that there are too many scroungers etc etc.

 
No, that would be UKIP and Gordon Brown. :14:

Anybody who thinks socialism and Marxist is a viability, clearly sees themselves as the organisers of that particular political viewpoint and just like Socialist Russia, stands as reason why that could never be a reality.

It's democracy with out a vote and a big fat union leader eating steak whilst his members survive with candles to cook.

Really not worth the effort, shame I didn't read this thread first.
 
OnMeHeadFred - 30/9/2013 15:27

Wurzel - 30/9/2013 13:19

Very dull speech from the Chancellor today. The idea that we are going to pay off the debt anytime soon is laughable.

Wouldn't it be thrilling if the Chancellor had the guts to mention Hayek, von Mises and Rothbard, rather than treat us all like children in need of a reassuring fairytale.

We might take him seriously then.

Boom and Bust :4:

You left our Keynes, and I'm sure the Bibliography can give you a few more.
 
Cameron must be fuming this morning after that disgusting paper the Daily Mail steals the limelight with the most ridiculous story about Red Ed's dad. Not only does it reflect poorly on that rag, but it damages the image of the party it claims to support.
 
OnMeHeadFred - 1/10/2013 11:45

Villan Of The North - 1/10/2013 10:05

OnMeHeadFred - 1/10/2013 10:52

Villan Of The North - 1/10/2013 08:23

OnMeHeadFred - 30/9/2013 16:27

Wurzel - 30/9/2013 13:19

Very dull speech from the Chancellor today. The idea that we are going to pay off the debt anytime soon is laughable.

Wouldn't it be thrilling if the Chancellor had the guts to mention Hayek, von Mises and Rothbard, rather than treat us all like children in need of a reassuring fairytale.

We might take him seriously then.

Perhaps he would if a)he thought it was relevant b)his audience, the general public, would have a clue what he was talking about c)he wanted to turn the UK into the 51st state of America.

I would go for b.

I wouldn't go so far as to claim that most Lefties can explain Marx's labour theory of value but when it comes to explaining Tory philosophy your average Tory voter hasn't got a clue.

It is sad to say.

This single post sums up, for me, your postings on all things political, at least what I have read. You are polarising the issues when in reality all UK main stream parties lie very much in the middle ground between these two philosophies. Labour are not Marxists and Conservative are not classical liberals. In fact the only countries that can claim to be genuinely classically liberal are 3rd world countries who lack the infrastructure to be anything else. Although the USA are making a good attempt at it with their healthcare system and banking regulation (or lack there of) but the UK and indeed all of the so called right wing Europeans in today's Europe are no where near.

All I was saying was that I have met a lot of Lefties in my time who understood the fundamentals of Socialism but I have never met a Tory voter who could explain Adam Smith, or monetarism.

Well now you've met one :14:

 
Villan Of The North - 2/10/2013 09:34

OnMeHeadFred - 1/10/2013 11:45

Villan Of The North - 1/10/2013 10:05

OnMeHeadFred - 1/10/2013 10:52

Villan Of The North - 1/10/2013 08:23

OnMeHeadFred - 30/9/2013 16:27

Wurzel - 30/9/2013 13:19

Very dull speech from the Chancellor today. The idea that we are going to pay off the debt anytime soon is laughable.

Wouldn't it be thrilling if the Chancellor had the guts to mention Hayek, von Mises and Rothbard, rather than treat us all like children in need of a reassuring fairytale.

We might take him seriously then.

Perhaps he would if a)he thought it was relevant b)his audience, the general public, would have a clue what he was talking about c)he wanted to turn the UK into the 51st state of America.

I would go for b.

I wouldn't go so far as to claim that most Lefties can explain Marx's labour theory of value but when it comes to explaining Tory philosophy your average Tory voter hasn't got a clue.

It is sad to say.

This single post sums up, for me, your postings on all things political, at least what I have read. You are polarising the issues when in reality all UK main stream parties lie very much in the middle ground between these two philosophies. Labour are not Marxists and Conservative are not classical liberals. In fact the only countries that can claim to be genuinely classically liberal are 3rd world countries who lack the infrastructure to be anything else. Although the USA are making a good attempt at it with their healthcare system and banking regulation (or lack there of) but the UK and indeed all of the so called right wing Europeans in today's Europe are no where near.

All I was saying was that I have met a lot of Lefties in my time who understood the fundamentals of Socialism but I have never met a Tory voter who could explain Adam Smith, or monetarism.

Well now you've met one :14:

Who chooses to live in a country which with a combination of a generous welfare state and capitalism sits in 1st place in the international Human Development Index, while the UK languishes back in 26th.

So a very wise man indeed.
:14:
 
Wurzel - 2/10/2013 09:30

Cameron must be fuming this morning after that disgusting paper the Daily Mail steals the limelight with the most ridiculous story about Red Ed's dad. Not only does it reflect poorly on that rag, but it damages the image of the party it claims to support.

It does seem a very strange story for the Mail to print and even stranger that they reprinted it in the face of objection.

There is just too much of a hint of a belief in the writings of Kevin Macdonald in the article, that Jewish culture and belief systems are an evolutionary strategy to out-compete the gentiles (blah, blah, blah), which includes a hatred of the culture of their host nations.

So basically they are saying that as Ralph Milliband was a Jew and Ed Milliband is a Jew, he has inherited his father's Jewish socialist beliefs and is therefore not fit to be Prime Minister.

I suppose for a paper which was virtually the London issue of Der Stürmer in the 1930s, a decade after Hitler had published his Nazi blueprint, we can't be surprised by their beliefs but if we are to stick to our Voltairian notions of free-speech we have to show the tolerance towards the Mail, it seems reluctant to offer anyone else.
 
Well I missed Mr Cameron's speech due to work, but watching the BBC News coverage ( yes I know, hardly impartial) they seem underwhelmed. No give aways, just the same old message. Maybe this was deliberate as the election is two years away but IMO they need a total rethink of their strategy. They need to challenge this nasty party label, and they need to appeal much more broadly if they really want to win outright an election. there is no chance of an election win on their current path.