zaijianforth
Vital Squad Member
Can the FA retrospectively ban Mee for the reckless tackle on Wesley. I'm amazed he got away with it. Apparently he broke Gomez's leg in a similar fashion.
Could have cost us the game. Only had to square it and Trez had a tap in to make it 3-0.
I blame him for my stress in the last 10 minutes.
Can the FA retrospectively ban Mee for the reckless tackle on Wesley. I'm amazed he got away with it. Apparently he broke Gomez's leg in a similar fashion.
Yes. To be fair it happened right in front of us and there was no real reaction from the Villa fans to the tackle.
It got a bit tasty when their fans booed Wesley off though.
He's got to stay on the pitch to be effective. Pussy.I think Targett will be a much better player as a wing back priority has to be a couple of strikers
Neanderthals. Most home fans will boo an opponent when they go down if they think they're milking it, but to continue to boo when the bloke is being stretchered off is just disgusting.Yes. To be fair it happened right in front of us and there was no real reaction from the Villa fans to the tackle.
It got a bit tasty when their fans booed Wesley off though.
Count me out of that reaction 57. I jumped up immediately and shouted "You dirty (Insert Fear-banned word here) Mee!" I saw the Gomez tackle live and as soon as the ball got played down the channel for Wes I knew he'd take the opportunity to clatter him. It was two-footed, with studs up. Intended to injure while "getting the ball." He knew exactly what he was doing.Exactly the same on TV Sir Den nobody even thought it was a foul.
Things get blown up out of all proportion
Any word on Wesley and Heaton?
I think Martin Keown got it right the other day when on MOTD with Ian Wright.
He claimed the camera's being used were not advanced enough to help make the decisions they're being asked to.
They're not high definition enough, nor do they have enough frames per minute.
All of these offside decisions are being made from an angle, which funnily enough does make a difference.
The idea of VAR is an excellent one but, in reality it is ruining the game of football as we know it.
Rugby have a similar system but, their decisions are rendered within 30 seconds.
I think Martin Keown got it right the other day when on MOTD with Ian Wright.
He claimed the camera's being used were not advanced enough to help make the decisions they're being asked to.
They're not high definition enough, nor do they have enough frames per minute.
All of these offside decisions are being made from an angle, which funnily enough does make a difference.
The idea of VAR is an excellent one but, in reality it is ruining the game of football as we know it.
Rugby have a similar system but, their decisions are rendered within 30 seconds.
... or too high definition. One could argue that if the camera shows a depth of at least 2 pixels which are offside then it's offside, in which case a lower definition would be useful to introduce a fuzz factor.
... or too high definition. One could argue that if the camera shows a depth of at least 2 pixels which are offside then it's offside, in which case a lower definition would be useful to introduce a fuzz factor.
Just watching the highlights of the goals again, both goals we have 4 players in the box and a couple in the final third. Luiz and Marv are also on the ball and playing it 20 yards from the opposition goal, not 20 yards from Heaton.
We only get large numbers of bodies in the box when we have set pieces, this is a massive improvement since the shit I saw at Watford.
Not sure if this is just luck, but we need the confidence to get players higher up and in the box, and play higher up sometimes.