The 2016/2017 comparison thread | Vital Football

The 2016/2017 comparison thread

  • Thread starter Deleted member 7310
  • Start date
D

Deleted member 7310

Guest
Same as last season, some will hate it some wont.

2016/2017 second round
Tottenham vs Chelsea 2-0 (W)
Tottenham vs West Brom 4-0 (W)
Man City vs Tottenham 2-2 (D)
Sunderland vs Tottenham 0-0 (D)
Tottenham vs Middlesbrough 1-0 (W) - Replaced with Norwich
Liverpool vs Tottenham 0-2 (L)
Tottenham vs Stoke 4-0 (W)
Tottenham vs Everton 3-2 (W)
Tottenham vs So'ton 2-1 (W)
Burnley vs Tottenham 2-0 (W) - Replaced with A.Villa
Swansea vs Tottenham 1-3 (W)
Tottenham vs Watford 4-0 (W)
Tottenham vs Bournemouth 4-0 (W)
Palace vs Tottenham 1-0 (W)
Tottenham vs ars*nal 2-0 (W)

2015/2016 second round:
Tottenham vs Chelsea 0-0 (D)
Tottenham vs West Brom 1-1 (D)
Man City vs Tottenham 2-1 (W)
Sunderland vs Tottenham 1-0 (W)
Tottenham vs Middlesbrough 3-0 (W) - Replaced with Norwich
Liverpool vs Tottenham 1-1 (D)
Tottenham vs Stoke 2-2 (D)
Tottenham vs Everton 0-0 (D)
Palace vs Tottenham 3-1 (W)
Tottenham vs So'ton 1-2 (L)
Burnley vs Tottenham 2-0 (W) - Replaced with A.Villa
Swansea vs Tottenham 2-2 (D)
Tottenham vs Watford 1-0 (W)
Tottenham vs Bournemouth 3-0 (W)
Leicester vs Tottenham 1-1 (D)
Tottenham vs ars*nal 2-2 (D)
West Ham vs Tottenham 0-1 (L)
Tottenham vs Man Utd 3-0 (W)
Hull City vs Tottenham 1-5 (L) - Replaced with Newcastle

32 points, 29 GF, 19 GA, +10 GD
8W, 8D, 3L

Total first round points 2016/2017:
39 points, 37 GF, 14 GA, +23 GD
11 W, 2 L, 6 D

Total first round points 2015/2016:
38 points, 40 GF, 16 GA, +24 GD
11 W, 3 L, 5 D

Replaced relegated teams with newly promoted(Alphabetically):
Aston Villa - Burnley
Newcastle - Hull
Norwich - Middlesbrough
 
After 4th round:

= points, +1 GF, +1 GA, = GD.
 
Other top 4 contenders at this stage(Bar City)

Chelsea +5
Manu: +4
Liverpool -1
ars*nal -1
Leicester -2
 
After 5th round:

= points, -2 GF, = GA, -2 GD.
 
Hate to say it but city just look to good this year. It really is a race for second! I hope we can challenge but we just can't afford to drop points by the looks of things. Kdb is looking ridiculous
 
DAVEYBOY88 - 18/9/2016 23:46

Hate to say it but city just look to good this year. It really is a race for second! I hope we can challenge but we just can't afford to drop points by the looks of things. Kdb is looking ridiculous

Kevin de bruyne is everything eriksen isnt. He is top class and runs the game for his team.
 
Worried the wheels will come off our matching results when we play City, but if we manage to beat them you really do have to start to feel optimistic
 
Jables - 19/9/2016 12:48

Loving this, keep up the good work Pollo!

I agree. I stickied this threat last season and it made interested reading throughout the season as it progressed. Considering the benchmark for this seasons comparisons saw us finish 3rd, knowing whether we are doing Comparatively well is reassuring. Right now we are par for the course with the exact same results as last term for example, which derails any myth about us starting well or badly straight off, by saying "we're doing the same"

Thanks again for sorting this thread, Pollo
 
After 6th round:

= points, -3 GF, +1 GA, -4 GD.

Same outcome in each of our 6 matches, with 3 identical results.
 
After 7th round:

= points, -5 GF, =GA, -5 GD.

We have the same outcome in all matches so far as last season, with 3 identical scorelines. At first it seemed that defending the points would be difficult, but now I believe we can achieve that - and even improve. Chelsh1t and Arse we drew last season, while ManU, Leicester and Hull(Newcastle) are L.
 
I reckon Chelsea and Arsescum are going to be the true yard sticks this season. If we beat those two this half of the season then for me, it really is time to start believing
 
I really want to beat the Chavs away this season.

As long as we dont get beaten by those 2 teams I am confident we can finish above them.

If we manage to beat WBrom next week we would be ahead in this comparison, which is pretty amazing.